<span>
Let's analyze Hannah's work, step-by-step, to see if she made any mistakes. </span>In Step 1, Hannah wrote

<span> as the sum of two separate derivatives </span>

<span>using the </span><span>sum rule.
</span>
This step is perfectly fine. In Step 2,

was kept as it is, and

was rewritten as

using the constant rule.Indeed, according to the constant rule, the derivative of a constant number is equal to zero.
This step is perfectly fine. In Step 3,

was rewritten as

supposedly using the constant multiple rule.
The problem is that according to the constant multiple rule,

should be rewritten as

and not as

.
<span>
Therefore, Hannah made a mistake in this step.</span>
Answer:
185 37 = 5 1; the scale factor is 5: 1. So every other linear measure is multiplied times 5. If we have the big right triangle and want to scale it down to make the smaller one, we write this: 37 185 = 1 5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
For this case a parameter represent the population data and for this case the parameter would be the true mean
who represent the amount of gasoline they used in the previous week

And the sample mean is an unbiased estimator of the true mean.
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case a parameter represent the population data and for this case the parameter would be the true mean
who represent the amount of gasoline they used in the previous week
And in order to estimate the parameter of interest we use a survey of n =3800 and the sample mean who represent an statistic is given by:

And we got:

And the sample mean is an unbiased estimator of the true mean.
Two angles are called complementary when their measures add to 90 degrees