<span>This is the behaviorist theory. This viewpoint takes into account all the ways in which we learn about our world and how we try to link these learned behaviors with our own thought processes. In addition, the behaviorist viewpoint is heavily in favor of seeing these behaviors as shaped by our outside environment, instead of being unconsciously determined.</span>
Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
Answer:A social category
Explanation:A social category is a collective number of people who all have similar characteristics eventhough they don't interact. For example, women, men, the elderly, and college school students all fall under social categories. A social category can transform or convert into a social group if people under social category start to interact with each other.
People who are found in the same place and who have similar characteristics but who do not interact are called social aggregates.
Answer:
I thought they were the same
Explanation:
True. If you are under 18 years of age in the US, you cannot be sentenced to death.
