1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kamila [148]
3 years ago
9

Mazie Supply Co. uses the percent of accounts receivable method. On December 31, it has outstanding accounts receivable of $49,0

00, and it estimates that 5% will be uncollectible. Prepare the year-end adjusting entry to record bad debts expense under the assumption that the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts has: (a) a $833 credit balance before the adjustment. (b) a $245 debit balance before the adjustment.
Business
1 answer:
natima [27]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

a. Dr Bad debt expense $1,617

Cr Allowance for doubtful debt $1,617

b. Dr Bad debt expense $2,205

Cr Allowance for doubtful debt $2,205

Explanation:

When a company makes sales on account, debit accounts receivable and credit sales. Based on assessment, some or all of the receivables may be uncollectible.  

To account for this, debit bad debit expense and credit allowance for doubtful debt. Should the debt become uncollectible (i.e go bad), debit allowance for doubtful debt and credit accounts receivable.

Estimated uncollectible amount

= 5% × $49,000

= $2,450

As such, if the allowance for doubtful;

has a $833 credit balance before the adjustment

Additional allowance required

=$2450 - $833

= $1,617

Entries required are

Dr Bad debt expense $1,617

Cr Allowance for doubtful debt $1,617

b) a $245 debit balance before the adjustment.

This means that off the amount uncollectible $245 has already gone bad

Adjusting entries required amounts to

= $2450 - $245

= $2205

Dr Bad debts expense $2205

Cr Allowance for doubtful debt $2205

You might be interested in
The nature of the tax system means that there is usually a trade-off between ___ and ___.
IgorC [24]

Answer:

<u>equity and efficiency</u>

Explanation:

Under the tax system there is no tax on losses. And also the losses can be carried forward and set off to profits in future.

When profits are earned the taxes are paid. After that the remaining profit is either distributed to equity or retained for future purposes.

The more efficiently the company works, higher will be the profit and higher will be the taxes.

As profit is for equity, and from that share the amount is given to tax authorities, which is some part of income, share of equity to tax.

Though it does not provide for right in company, but it is legal to pay the tax.

That is the price you pay for increasing or decreasing efficiency, in the form of income available for equity.

5 0
3 years ago
In constructing a common-size income statement, depreciation will be______. A. omitted since it is a noncash expense. B. express
Naddika [18.5K]

Answer:

B. expressed as a percentage of sales.

Explanation:

The common size income statement is the income statement where n each line the item on the income statement should be expressed as a percentage of sales

In the given options, the option B is correct as it shows that the depreciation would be expressed in sales percentage

Therefore all other options are wrong

3 0
3 years ago
American expansionism after the 1890s:
lisabon 2012 [21]

Answer:

a. was largely driven by the desire for expanded overseas trade

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Listening skills are often as difficult to develop as speaking skills.<br><br> True<br> False
Drupady [299]

some people say its true others say its false

I would say its false

hope this helps :)

5 0
3 years ago
A firm agreed to pay its workers ​$2525 an hour in 2016 and ​$4141 an hour in 2017. The price level for these years was 241 in 2
NemiM [27]

Answer:

(a) 10.4%; 16.73%

(b) 6.33%

Explanation:

Given that,

Wages paid to the workers in 2016 = $25 per hour

Price level in 2016 = 241

Wages paid to the workers in 2017 = $41 per hour

Price level in 2017 = 245

Real wage rate in 2016:

= (Nominal wages ÷ Price level) × 100

= ($25 ÷ 241) × 100

= 0.104 × 100

= 10.4%

Real wage rate in 2017:

= (Nominal wages ÷ Price level) × 100

= ($41 ÷ 245) × 100

= 0.1673 × 100

= 16.73%

Therefore, the real wage increase received by these workers in​ 2017 is calculated as follows:

= Real wage rate in 2017 - Real wage rate in 2016

= 16.73% -  10.4%

= 6.33%

Hence, these workers do get a raise between the two years.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Rauch Inc. leases a piece of equipment to Donahue Corp. on Jan 1 2017. The lease agreement called for annual rental payments of
    11·1 answer
  • Why is looking at cash flow an important step in a good financial plan?
    11·1 answer
  • When a nation is under-allocating resources to the production of a good, then the:_________.
    8·1 answer
  • The cost object of the plantwide overhead rate method is: Select one:
    14·1 answer
  • Cumulus Corp. wants to generate goodwill among its customers. It aims at gaining a favorable impression that can positively impa
    6·2 answers
  • Pharoah Company had the following two transactions related to its delivery truck. 1. Paid $280 for an oil change. 2. Paid $600 t
    7·1 answer
  • Question:
    9·1 answer
  • Tim, a real estate investor, Ken, a dealer in securities, and Hardware, Inc., a retail lumber store, form a partnership called H
    12·1 answer
  • Actual payroll posts simultaneously as a commitment, obligation, expense, and disbursement (COED) by means of a Journal Voucher
    13·1 answer
  • Say you are planning to start a new business. You expect to have losses for the first 2 years and then achieve significant profi
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!