Japan were not so much unhappy with the outcome of the treaty of Versailles as with how the treaty negotiations took place.
They felt probably correctly that they had been sidelined by the four major powers. However it should be noted that Japan didn't have any role in the European theatre of the war and its contribution was largely confined to providing convoy escorts and attacking Imperial Germany's possessions in the pacific.
For minimal effort during the war Japan was given what had been Germanys pacific Islands together with former territories in China.
The last part was hugely controversial the Germans had seized Shandong from the Chinese and the allies rather than return it to China gave it to Japan.
The Americans as well as some other allies used the venue of Versailles to make criticisms of the rather brutal way that Japan chose to run its empire. At this stage Japan controlled Korea chunks of China as well as various other smaller territories.
The Japanese never attempted to disguise the fact that they viewed other asians as racially inferior. The racial equality motion was merely an attempt to draw equivalence between their empire and the British and French empires.
<span>So at the time the Japanese weren't particuarly displeased at the versailles treaty. In later years it would become tied with the hated Washington naval agreements signed in 1921 which would lead to massive unrest in the Japanese military.</span>
What are the answer choices?
The following were part of the Columbia Exchange except : (c). potatoes and corn were introduced into the Americas from Europe.
<h3>Meaning of Columbia Exchange</h3>
Columbian exchange can be defined as a kind of exchange that occurred between the New world of America and the old world of Europe and Africa.
This exchange helped diversified and transferred cultures between the counterparts.
In conclusion, The following were part of the Columbia Exchange except : (c). potatoes and corn were introduced into the Americas from Europe.
Learn more about Exchange: brainly.com/question/1366402
#SPJ1
Between the 1870s and 1900, Africa faced European imperialist aggression, diplomatic pressures, military invasions, and eventual conquest and colonization. At the same time, African societies put up various forms of resistance against the attempt to colonize their countries and impose foreign domination. By the early twentieth century, however, much of Africa, except Ethiopia and Liberia, had been colonized by European powers.
The European imperialist push into Africa was motivated by three main factors, economic, political, and social. It developed in the nineteenth century following the collapse of the profitability of the slave trade, its abolition and suppression, as well as the expansion of the European capitalist Industrial Revolution. The imperatives of capitalist industrialization—including the demand for assured sources of raw materials, the search for guaranteed markets and profitable investment outlets—spurred the European scramble and the partition and eventual conquest of Africa. Thus the primary motivation for European intrusion was economic.
