Based on historical records, D’Aelders portrayal of women contrasts with Fragonard’s portrayal of women in many ways. Some of which are the following:
D’Aelders tried to depict women as victims who were denied many things, including birth-given rights.
On the other hand, Fragonard characterizes women as rioters, violent in nature, and always causes dispute.
Also, D’Aelders portrays women as a group promoting equality, while Fragonard represents women as a group that does not endorse suffrage.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are differences between D’Aelders and Fragonard's portrayal of women.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/867220
Answer:
Original Sin caused the relationship between God and human beings to be deprived of original holiness and justice. God created a covenant with all humans, saying that he would send his one and only son to save them from original sin.
Hello!
The enlightenment do not defend that "no one should pay taxes". The problem in France was that the Elite do not paid taxes.
b)
hugs!
The answer is B: the southern colonies refused to allow farmers to grow crash
Answer:
<h2>
True</h2>
There is often debate over the causes that lay at the start of the Civil War. Some will say it was not primarily about slavery but about states' rights--their ability to do things their own way or even go their own way (leave the Union) if they wished. The reality is that both issues lay at the heart of why the Civil War was fought. A principal reason why the seceding states were asserting their rights and leaving was because of the issue of slavery.
John Pierce did a documentary study on "The Reasons for Secession," for <em>American Battlefield Trust. </em>He looked especially at "Declarations of Causes" documents that four of the Confederate States added to their articles of secession. The documents from those states (South Carolina, Georgia, Mississippi, and Texas) showed both slavery and states' rights as the two predominant themes. As to the issue of a state's right to leave the Union, Pierce summed up the theme from the primary documents this way: "The states argue that the Union is a compact, one that can be annulled if the states are not satisfied with what they receive in return from other states and/or from the federal government."
