Answer:
The mirror projects items larger than they actually are.
Explanation:
Answer:
Hence correct option is b i.e 7.2 yuan.
Explanation:
Given data;
candy bar cost is $1
Nominal exchange rate = 6 yuan equal to 1 dollar
Real exchange rate is = 1.2 dollar per 6 yuan
Therefore price for one candy at china will be ![= 1.2 \times 6 = 7.2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3D%201.2%20%5Ctimes%206%20%3D%207.2)
The price of candy bar at china is = 7.2 yuan
Hence correct option is b i.e 7.2 yuan.
Answer:
It introduces dangers that are not visible.
Explanation:
this setting detail advance the plot by introducing danger that are not visible that is the dog did not want to go. It hung back until the man shoved it forward, and then it went quickly across the white, unbroken surface. Suddenly it broke through, floundered to one side, and got away to firmer footing. It had wet its forefeet and legs, and almost immediately the water that clung to it turned to ice.
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
In developing an effective strategy for a hunter who wants to identify and track a quarry, what the hunter needs to understand and know first is the animal's CHARACTERISTICS and there are four basic characteristics. These will assist you in order to fully understand your quarry.