Answer:
I think it's development. But can I see the choices?
Answer:
1) Military: domination: the line was built to exercise ‘effective control’ in the Scramble for Africa, or to dispatch troops for better control of the native population;
2) Mining: the line was built into the interior to further European mining interests, and;
3) Cash crops: the colonial power built the line to connect agriculturally rich areas. With limited budgets, colonisers expected the railroads to pay for themselves, hence they connected areas of high economic potential.
Explanation:
History :D
American Indians are the most impoverished racial group in the country. Not surprisingly, if you compare Indian communities to other impoverished areas in the United States, you’ll see similarities in terms of single motherhood, teen pregnancy, drug use, and violence.
International governmental organizations :
are able to operate in every country that is part of the group
IGO's have a global scope-The members of an international organization usually state, but today non-state actors also tend to be considered in membership. Some International governmental organizations set a global agenda and can limit the power of the member states (For example the European Union is seen as a classic example of this, where state power is limited and the regulations tend to be applied among all members of the EU). Another major example is the United Nations, especially the Council of Security that has a wide array of topics in regard to military intervention and peacebuilding.
Other representative examples with a wide range of action are:
International Criminal Court
International Monetary Fund
World Bank Group- World Trade Organization
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
