With the case study given above, it may be ascertained that,
- The want to avoid 'The CSI Effect' is a non-discriminatory reason to eliminate the jurors in general, as it does not conflict to any social discrimination based upon gender, race or other such factors;
- Furthermore, it is to be assumed that 'The CSI Effect' is directly tied to age as per the beliefs of Angela, and involves social discrimination based on the age of jurors.
<h3>What is social discrimination?</h3>
Any discriminative act, which directly relates to a biased behavior based upon the factors such as age, race, gender, ethnicity, and other such factors contained under Constitution lead to social discrimination.
As per the beliefs of Angela, her act of wanting to avoid 'The CSI Effect' conflicts a social discrimination for young jurors only, and not in general, as it is a discrimination of age.
Hence, the significance of social discrimination is aforementioned.
Learn more about social discrimination here:
brainly.com/question/13964317
#SPJ1
Hugo beef chicken
Administration officials say the government has no plans for a new plan for a new president in a long way for the national security to meet the national government for a new plan to stop the government and government officials in a new plan for the president president in a new plan for the president of the country for a new plan for the president of national president in a new national government in a new plan to halt national security and plan for the national security plan to protest against the president and national president of president hun president and national security adviser to the new plan
Because some people can have tons of money and not struggle to pay anything while others may be struggling to pay anything, they believe that the rich should pay higher taxes so people with less money can live comfortably.
The answer is A. The preamble to the second amendment.
