when determining who will stay in the jury, the attorneys ask the potential jurors certain questions to determine their competence to serve in the case.That is, whether or not they have the tendency of being biased. Questions are also asked to inquire that the potential juror will not be caused any form of hardship if selected.
Potential jurors are asked about their backgrounds, biases, and any knowledge they have about the case at hand.
Dismissal for cause is done when potential juror is seen as unqualified or unfit to serve in the case while peremptory challenge is when the attorneys reject a number of potential jurors without stating the reason.
The attorney would use the dismissal for cause mechanism if from the voir dire, a candidate appears unqualified. The attorney would choose to use the peremptory challenge if a candidate that appears qualified has the likelihood of favoring the opposing party.
C.
i think is right sry. IF I’m wrong
Answer:
because the Constitution does not address how state and local government share power
Answer:
Over time, voting rights have been expanding in a notorious and fair way. Thus, initially, only white men with high purchasing power of legal age could exercise their right to vote. Subsequently, the economic requirement was abolished, allowing all white men to exercise this right.
After the Civil War, the northern states of the country allowed African Americans the right to vote, while the southern states exercised segregation over them. During the late 1800s and early 1900s, women, through feminist movements, obtained the right to participate in elections. Finally, African Americans consolidated their right to vote after the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed.