1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Morgarella [4.7K]
3 years ago
13

A historian is writing a paper on the idea of the divine right of kings in Europe during the Middle Ages. She reads a speech by

a bishop in the Middle Ages claiming that kings were appointed by God to rule over people. She then explains why the bishop would have believed this idea, even if it is not one that most people believe today. What is she doing in this paper?
The historian is explaining cause and effect.
The historian is placing the argument in historical context.
The historian is comparing and contrasting primary sources.
The historian is developing a hypothesis.
History
1 answer:
Ganezh [65]3 years ago
4 0
I believe the answer is :<span>The historian is placing the argument in historical context.

Argument with historical context would tried to explain a certain historical event based on </span>the social, political, religious,  and economic conditions that existed during a certain time and place.In the example above, the historian choose to base her argument on religious conditions in the past.
You might be interested in
What’s the difference between astronomy and astrology
Andru [333]

Astronomy is the science that study stars, planets, galaxies and other thing that exist in the known universe. As a science it follows the same principles as other fields like chemistry or physics. Astrology is the theory that links certain behaviours or even prediction of the future based on the movements and the influences of the stars on our lifes. So, the difference is that one is a science field, the other is a theory.

3 0
3 years ago
Why was the articles of confederation purposely created to be weak?
gayaneshka [121]

Answer: Because of widespread fear of a strong central government at the time they were written and strong loyalties among Americans to their own state as opposed to any national government during the American Revolution, the Articles of Confederation purposely kept the national government as weak as possible

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Mee: 5324611502 Pa: here​
gtnhenbr [62]
No but are u a fart cause u blew me away
3 0
2 years ago
Please help me like right now and don’t scam me
topjm [15]
Can you please zoom in a little bit more cause I cant see it clearly
3 0
3 years ago
Where did the United States hope to expand to the in 1840’s
lisabon 2012 [21]
TO THE PACIFIC, NOT 100% SURE THO
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • George is studying Basque, a language spoken by a group of people who live in the Pyrenees mountain range between France and Spa
    10·1 answer
  • What was the main effect of the cotton gin on slaves?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the bubonic plague MOST LIKELY first occur in Europe in port towns in Italy and France?
    9·2 answers
  • The Transcontinental Railroad was built and covered areas from
    11·2 answers
  • Olive branch petition demonstrates that
    11·1 answer
  • 7. What role did geographic location play in the history of Byzantium? What were its advantages and disadvantages?
    9·1 answer
  • If a bill passes the house of representatives what is the next step in the process of a bill becoming a law?
    8·1 answer
  • 6
    6·1 answer
  • Write at least 5 complete sentences and explain what was Columbian exchange and how it changed the New World and the Old World.
    12·1 answer
  • Question 10 of 50
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!