1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
viva [34]
3 years ago
12

I WILL GIVE THE BRAINIEST The numbers in this data set represent the ages of the members in a gymnastics class.

Mathematics
1 answer:
zloy xaker [14]3 years ago
3 0
It’s 7777777777777777777777777777
You might be interested in
What does x+7=2 what does x mean
Ksenya-84 [330]

Answer:-5

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
A. Do some research and find a city that has experienced population growth.
horrorfan [7]
A. The city we will use is Orlando, Florida, and we are going to examine its population growth from 2000 to 2010. According to the census the population of Orlando was 192,157 in 2000 and 238,300 in 2010. To examine this population growth period, we will use the standard population growth equation N_{t} =N _{0}e^{rt}
where:
N(t) is the population after t years
N_{0} is the initial population 
t is the time in years 
r is the growth rate in decimal form 
e is the Euler's constant 
We now for our investigation that N(t)=238300, N_{0} =192157, and t=10; lets replace those values in our equation to find r:
238300=192157e^{10r}
e^{10r} = \frac{238300}{192157}
ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{238300}{192157} )
r= \frac{ln( \frac{238300}{192157}) }{10}
r=0.022
Now lets multiply r by 100% to obtain our growth rate as a percentage:
(0.022)(100)=2.2%
We just show that Orlando's population has been growing at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

B. Here we will examine the population decline of Detroit, Michigan over a period of ten years: 2000 to 2010.
Population in 2000: 951,307
Population in 2010: 713,777
We know from our investigation that N(t)=713777, N_{0} =951307, and t=10. Just like before, lets replace those values into our equation to find r:
713777=951307e^{10r}
e^{10r} = \frac{713777}{951307}
ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{713777}{951307} )
r= \frac{ln( \frac{713777}{951307}) }{10}
r=-0.029
(-0.029)(100)= -2.9%.
We just show that Detroit's population has been declining at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

C. Final equation from point A: N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}.
Final equation from point B: N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}
Similarities: Both have an initial population and use the same Euler's constant.
Differences: In the equation from point A the exponent is positive, which means that the function is growing; whereas, in equation from point B the exponent is negative, which means that the functions is decaying.

D. To find the year in which the population of Orlando will exceed the population of Detroit, we are going equate both equations N(t)=192157e^{0.022t} and N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t} and solve for t:
192157e^{0.022t} =951307e^{-0.029t}
\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{951307e^{-0.029t} } =1
e^{0.051t} = \frac{951307}{192157}
ln(e^{0.051t})=ln( \frac{951307}{192157})
t= \frac{ln( \frac{951307}{192157}) }{0.051}
t=31.36
We can conclude that if Orlando's population keeps growing at the same rate and Detroit's keeps declining at the same rate, after 31.36 years in May of 2031 Orlando's population will surpass Detroit's population.

E. Since we know that the population of Detroit as 2000 is 951307, twice that population will be 2(951307)=1902614. Now we can rewrite our equation as: N(t)=1902614e^{-0.029t}. The last thing we need to do is equate our Orlando's population growth equation with this new one and solve for t:
192157e^{0.022t} =1902614e^{-0.029t}
\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{1902614e^{-0.029t} } =1
e^{0.051t} = \frac{1902614}{192157}
ln(e^{0.051t} )=ln( \frac{1902614}{192157} )
t= \frac{ln( \frac{1902614}{192157}) }{0.051}
t=44.95
We can conclude that after 45 years in 2045 the population of Orlando will exceed twice the population of Detroit. 

  
8 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP‼️‼️Drag the expression that is the most reasonable measurement for each object.
Afina-wow [57]

Answer:

<em>A. Length of a Tour Bus                       ↔     #2.      1.1 × 10¹ meters</em>

<em />

<em>B. Width of an apple                             ↔      #3.     4 × 10⁰ centimeters</em>

<em />

<em>C. Distance from Earth to a Satellite    ↔    #6.     8 × 10² kilometers</em>

<em />

<em>D. Thickness of a human hair               ↔     #5.      9 × 10¹ micrometers</em>

Explanation:

<u><em>A. Length of a tour bus.</em></u>

The length of a tour bus should be measured in meters. It sure is way less than 1 kilometer and way more than a few centimeters. It could be about some meters, more than 5 meters, may be between 10 meters and 15 meters.

The measurement in the box # 2. is 1.1 × 10¹ meters, which is equivalent to 1.1 × 10meters = 11 meters. Thus, this is a reasonable length.

<u><em>B. Width of an apple.</em></u>

The most appropiate unit to measure the width of an apple should be centimer. It certanly is shorter than 1 meter and bigger than 1 mm.

The width of an apple could be, more or less, around 8 centimeters. The only measurement in the boxes that is in that order is that in the box #3., 4 × 10⁰ centimeters, because 10⁰ = 1, so 4 × 10⁰ = 4 × 1 = 4centimeters.

<u><em>C. Distance from Earth to a Satellite</em></u>

The distance from Earth to a satellite should be measured in kilometers.

You can find in the internet that the distances of the satellites are between 700 kilometers and 36,000 kilometers.

The number in the box #1 is too big, in the order of ten trillions of kilometers, because one trillion is 10¹²; thus that is notreasonalbe (too big).

The number in the box #6 is  8 × 10² kilometers, which is equal to 8 × 100 = 800 kilometers.

Thus,  8 × 10² kilometers (box #6) is the most reasonable measurement for the distance from Earth to a Satellite

<u><em></em></u>

<u><em>D. Thickness of a human hair</em></u>

Of course, kilometers, meters, centimeters and even milimeters are units too big to measure the thickness of a human hair.

One micrometer is 10⁻⁶ meters or 10⁻³ milimeters.

In the internet you can find that diameter of the humar hairis in the range from 17 micrometers to 181 micrometers.

The measurement in the box #5. is 9 × 10¹ micrometers, which is equivalent to 9 × 10 = 90 micrometers.

Thus, 9 × 10¹ micrometers is the most reasonable measurement fot the thickness of a human hair.

7 0
3 years ago
-8x = -96 <br> (a)-14 <br> (b) -13<br> (c)-12<br> (D) 12
Leto [7]

Answer:

D) 12

Step-by-step explanation:

divide each term by -8 and simplify

-8/-8x=-96/-8

x=12

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ramon travels 20 miles in 20 minutes, how many miles can he travel in 120 minutes?
Elis [28]

Answer: 120

Step-by-step explanation:

20 divided by 20 is 1.

We have to multiply this by 120.

120 x 1 = 120. It is the answer.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The second of two number is 5 times first. Their sum is 42 . Find both numbers
    11·2 answers
  • Evaluate the expression 3(7 + 4)2 − 14 ÷ 7. 50 361 363 586
    15·2 answers
  • A cone has a slant height of 25 inches and a radius of 7 cm what is the volume of the cone. Please show explanation, I have been
    6·1 answer
  • A cereal manufacturer claims that there are an average of 200 raisins in each box of cereal. let µ represent the average number
    9·2 answers
  • Mary picks 15 flowers from her garden. If 3 out of 5 of these flowers are yellow, how many yellow flowers does Mary pick?
    8·2 answers
  • 2) Chicken soup is 3 cans for $0.55. How much would a<br> dozen soup cans cost?
    5·2 answers
  • Can anyone help please! Giving 100 points
    11·2 answers
  • Help I don't understand this
    14·2 answers
  • Which one is smaller, 2 6/25 or 2 1/8
    6·2 answers
  • Cuba has a population of 1.1×10⁷,and and area of 1.1×10⁵ km². Barbados has a population of 2.8×10⁵,and an area of 4.3×10² km². I
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!