Answer:
A company purchases inventory on credit.
Explanation:
Current liabilities are those that have to be settled within the fiscal year. The statement above does not specify if the credit has to be paid within the fiscal year, but most likely it has to, because inventories do not usually represent a long-term debt.
So under this sceneario, purchasing inventory on credit would represent an increase in the current liabilities of the firm.
Explanation:
to calculate the loss without Isr the company removed isr form its revenue and loss metrics for both presented years in calculating the adjusted ebitda
Answer:
the customer is prohibited from buying these securities
Explanation:
In the situation being described the statement that would be true is that the customer is prohibited from buying these securities. This is because intrastate offerings are security offerings that can only be purchased in the state in which it is being offered in and only by permanent residents of that state. Seeing since the customer in this scenario has his permanent residence in Colorado and not Montana, then he cannot purchase this offering.
The Stackelberg solution can be used to find the perfect or stable Nash equilibrium or equilibria.
<h3>What is this equilibrium about?</h3>
Other answers:
Based on the above, Note that the strategy profile is one where one serves best each player, and based on the strategies of the other player and it covers the fact that all player playing in a Nash equilibrium must be in every subgame.
Note also that The Stackelberg leadership model is said to be a kind off strategic game that is played in economics where the leader firm is known to moves first and then the follower firms is said to then move in a sequential manner and I think, the solution do not change if stackelberg game is considered in the long run.
I believe that the stackelberg leader will not collude with the stackelberg follower but in a lot of cases, there may be a collusion.
Yes, a Stackelberg leader can be more likely or less likely to merge with the follower firm as a merger can be profitable to them.
Learn more about equilibrium from
brainly.com/question/517289
#SPJ1
Answer: less
Explanation:
i don´t know for real sorry ;(
