1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leno4ka [110]
3 years ago
13

B. What were the results of the war between Native Americans and English settlers in 1675?

History
1 answer:
Ganezh [65]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Thousands of Indians were killed, wounded or captured and sold into slavery or indentured servitude. The war decimated the Narragansett, Wampanoag and many smaller tribes and mostly ended Indian resistance in southern New England, paving the way for additional English settlements.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What aspects of German American culture did other Americans find threatening?
Dmitriy789 [7]

Answer:

For German Americans, the 20th century was a time of growth and consolidation; their numbers increased, their finances became more stable, and Americans of German heritage rose to positions of great power and distinction. For German American culture, however, the new century was a time of severe setbacks--and a devastating blow from which it has never fully recovered.

The coming of World War I brought with it a backlash against German culture in the United States. When the U.S. declared war on Germany in 1917, anti-German sentiment rose across the nation, and German American institutions came under attack. Some discrimination was hateful, but cosmetic: The names of schools, foods, streets, and towns, were often changed, and music written by Wagner and Mendelssohn was removed from concert programs and even weddings. Physical attacks, though rare, were more violent: German American businesses and homes were vandalized, and German Americans accused of being "pro-German" were tarred and feathered, and, in at least once instance, lynched.

Ten Little Hyphens

The most pervasive damage was done, however, to German language and education. German-language newspapers were either run out of business or chose to quietly close their doors. German-language books were burned, and Americans who spoke German were threatened with violence or boycotts. German-language classes, until then a common part of the public-school curriculum, were discontinued and, in many areas, outlawed entirely. None of these institutions ever fully recovered, and the centuries-old tradition of German language and literature in the United States was pushed to the margins of national life, and in many places effectively ended.

President Woodrow Wilson spoke disapprovingly of "hyphenated Americans" whose loyalty he claimed was divided. One government official warned that "Every citizen must declare himself American--or traitor." Many German Americans struggled with their feelings, realizing that sympathy for their homeland appeared to conflict with loyalty to the U.S.

Some German Americans reacted by overtly defending their loyalty to the United States. Others changed the names of their businesses, and sometimes even their own names, in an attempt to conceal German ties and to disappear into mainstream America. Ironically, and contrary to Wilson's opinion about divided loyalties, thousands of German Americans fought to defend America in World War I, led by German American John J. Pershing, whose family had long before changed their name from Pfoerschin.

General John Pershing with the 2nd Division, Germany, 1919

Fifteen years later, the shadows of a new war brought another surge in immigration. When Germany's Nazi party came to power in 1933, it triggered a significant exodus of artists, scholars and scientists, as Germans and other Europeans fled the coming storm. Most eminent among this group was a pacifist Jewish scientist named Albert Einstein.

Anti-German feelings arose again during World War II, but they were not as powerful as they had been during the first World War. The loyalty of German Americans was not questioned as virulently. Dwight Eisenhower, a descendant of the Pennsylvania Dutch and future president of the United States, commanded U.S. troops in Europe. Two other German Americans, Admiral Chester Nimitz of the United States Navy and General Carl Spaatz of the Army Air Corps, were by Eisenhower's side and played key roles in the struggle against Nazi Germany.

General Dwight D. Eisenhower

World War II, industrial expansion, and Americanization efforts reinforced the cultural assimilation of many German Americans. After the war, one more surge of German immigrants arrived in the United States, as survivors of the conflict sought to escape its grim aftermath. These new arrivals were extremely diverse in their political viewpoints, their financial status, and their religious beliefs, and settled throughout the U.S.

German immigration to the United States continues to this day, though at a slower pace than in the past, carrying on a tradition of cultural enrichment over 400 years old—a tradition that has helped shape much of what we today consider to be quintessentially American.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
NEED HELP ASAP BEEN STUCK ON THIS FOR AWHILE, PLZ HELP ME! IM SO CONFUSED!
Andrei [34K]

Explanation:

In simpler words, the multi-part question is asking for you to first analyze the three sources, then pick a side and have knowledge to defend your point on the question 'to what extent should nations pursue their national interests'.

In source 1, it shows that the majority of Canadians are opposed to sending troops to Afghanistan, with 36% voting for, 5% unsure, and 59% voting against.

Source two is clearly depicting the nazi's, at a rally held in Nuremberg. Although the source does not state if the protesters are pro or against Nazi regime, I am assuming they are pro. This would lead to the assumption that the people of Nuremberg are pro-Nazi empire.

The source 3 is a timeline, that goes from 1920 to 2005. This time period is very significant, because it captures many important battles, such as world war 2, Persian Gulf War, and the Iraq invasion.

After reading these three sources, you must decide if you think it is good for  nations to pursue their national interests, or bad.

Hope this long explanation helped clarify the troubling question for you!

8 0
2 years ago
Medieval serfs a. possessed no customary rights to cottages and farmland. b. owed their lord labor services. c. had the benefit
xxTIMURxx [149]

Answer:

b. owed their lord labor services.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
About five thousand years ago, the rains over the Sahara began to decline and grasslands gave way to desert. The population of t
koban [17]
They were influenced by rain and where they were there was no rain and some with cold from the change of climate
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why would people in the area of Norman be concerned with studying oceanic conditions?
NeTakaya

Answer:

the first one

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • St. Patrick's Day parades in major cities celebrate the ancestry of Americans.
    8·1 answer
  • In 1626, Peter Minuit became the director of the first Dutch colony in the Americas, which was located in which modern-day locat
    10·1 answer
  • What was the alien act?
    12·2 answers
  • A government in which a monarch shares power with other branches of government is called a
    9·1 answer
  • What group helped develop the navigation system in Oklahoma?
    9·1 answer
  • Why was the construction of railroads encouraged in the Indian Territory?
    7·2 answers
  • What does the chart indicate about American employment during World War I?
    12·2 answers
  • What is your reaction to this letter?
    15·1 answer
  • What arguments does Whattley make in support of the sugar act
    13·1 answer
  • What were some important features of Shang society?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!