Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": for negligence because the harm was foreseeable.
Explanation:
In Law, foreseeability is a concept related to what the proximate causes could be after an event. The concept is helpful to determine the limit of liability according to the primary event that happened and the type and manner of harm. The harm caused by rescuers like firefighters and negligence of health care providers like doctors and nurses is considered foreseeable.
<em>In Emmy's case, the repeated thefts to the store where she works while having a nonfunctioning alarm (negligence) make the store owner liable for the injuries caused by a perpetrator who broke Emmy's leg during a robbery since that event was foreseeable.</em>
Answer:
Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Accounts receivables = $1,500,000
Allowance for doubtful accounts = $90,000
Expected uncollectibles = $125,000
The collection of accounts receivables after the adjustment for bad debt expense is determined by deducting the expected uncollectibles from the total amount of accounts receivables.
Accounts receivable amount expected to be collected after adjustment for bad debt expense:
= Accounts receivables - Expected uncollectibles
= $1,500,000 - $125,000
= $1,375,000
It’s going to be A and it’s self explanatory so i don’t have an explanation
Answer:
pooled interdependence.
Explanation:
The single crop is a company with three different division. Three division who work independently and do not interact with each other but work towards the betterment of the whole company can be described as pooled interdependence. Pooled interdependence is a way in which companies operated by designing different department that works independently towards a common goal.
The question incomplete! The complete question along with answer and explanation is provided below.
Question:
Eagle Life Insurance Company pays its employees $.30 per mile for driving their personal automobiles to and from work. The company reimburses each employee who rides the bus $100 a month for the cost of a pass. Tom, in his Mazda 2-seat Roadster, collected $100 for his automobile mileage, and Mason received $100 as reimbursement for the cost of a bus pass.
a. What are the effects of the $100 reimbursement on Tom's and Mason's gross income?
b. Assume that Tom and Mason are in the 24% marginal tax bracket and the actual before-tax cost for Tom to drive to and from work is $0.30 per mile. What are Tom's and Mason's after-tax costs of commuting to and from work?
Explanation:
a.
For Tom:
He is required to include the $100 in gross income therefore, he would have to pay after-tax cost on the reimbursement.
For Mason:
He is not required to include the $100 in gross income due to qualified transportation fringe.
b.
For Tom:
Marginal tax = 24%
The after-tax cost of commuting = 0.24*$100 = $24
The before-tax cost of commuting = $0 (since he was reimbursed)
For Mason:
The after-tax cost of commuting = $0
The before-tax cost of commuting = $0 (since he was reimbursed)
