Answer: Micro system
Explanation:
According to the given question, the tanner's friends doing very well in the school but he is not doing good. So, they all are decided for start doing the group study and then the tanner also perform better in the school.
- Based on the ecological system perspective, the tanner's performance is basically comes from the micro system.
- As, the micro system helps in the development of the child by interacting with the others in the immediate environment.
- In the micro system the child develop their skills more fastly due to the social interaction.
Therefore, Micro system is the correct answer.
If the statement above asks if it is true or false, the answer would be true. It is because when there is a presence of shortage, they will put a high price, in order for the demand, in which those consumers who could afford it and want it, bought it, making the demand lower for the ones who could only take the product that had set in a high price would be the consumers who could afford them. It could also be called a marketing technique in order for the producers to sell their product.
Answer:
The correct answer is: Release from proactive interference.
Explanation:
Proactive interference occurs when an individual memorizes a list of information, (be it names, ideas, formulas) and when trying to remember a last part of that list, an initial information suddenly get's in the way.
For example, Lucas first memorized the name of the cities of Spain and then the name of the cities of Italy. When trying to recall the name of the cities of Italy he suddenly starts remembering the names of the city of Spain that he previously was not able to recall.
In this particular case, when reviewing the new terms for the upcoming biology test, the performance for the french vocabulary words was noticeably better, because I was experiencing Release from proactive interference.
<span>balanced growth of all economic sectors.</span>
Human rights in Myanmar under its military regime have long been regarded as among the worst in the world.[1][2] International human rights organisations including Human Rights Watch,[3] Amnesty International,[4] and the American Association for the Advancement of Science[5] have repeatedly documented and condemned widespread human rights violations in Burma. The Freedom in the World 2011 report by Freedom House notes that "The military junta has... suppressed nearly all basic rights; and committed human rights abuses with impunity." In 2011 the "country's more than 2,100 political prisoners included about 429 members of the NLD, the victors in the 1990 elections."[6] As of July 2013, according to the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners, there were about 100 political prisoners in Burmese prisons.[7][8][9][10]
