Answer:here bro
Explanation:
Our country is hundreds of years old, our territory is rich, rich, productive and efficient. Our people are honest, hardworking and ready to take care of their own destiny, their own business and their own prosperity. Amidst all these admirable qualities I wonder: how long will we be subjected to the British abuses that prevent our nation from moving forward.
We are a captive people, as we have no control over our own resources, which have been exploited dishonestly by the British for years. First of all, we must stress that England forbids us to freely negotiate our products, produced and built, planted and harvested by us. This keeps us at the mercy of the English trade, which believes that it has the right to price our work in a way that reduces us and leaves us dependent on England.
We are not a dependent people and we have to reaffirm our supremacy over our products and our autonomy to do business as we see fit.
Not satisfied, England decided to enrich our costs by charging abusive and totally unjust taxes, which are not transformed into services for us but for them. As a result, england is increasingly educated and structured, while we do not have the financial resources to improve education, transportation, communication and countless socioeconomic issues in our country.
This makes me ask you, readers: How long will we accept this type of administration? Will we have to wait thousands of years? Haven't we already been harmed enough by this petty nation? Shouldn't we fight for our defense?
Answer: I would say true but I’m not sure. Sorry if you get it wrong
John Locke was a political philosopher who wrote on the necessity of the separation of powers in government as well as the necessity of revolution in overthrowing unjust government. These two values had an enormous impact on both the Declaration of Independence and also the American Constitution. Montesquieu was also an important philosophical thinker who wrote on the value in the separation of powers between the executive, legislative, and judiciary. In addition Montesquieu believed in the creation of a system of checks and balances between the branches of government which also greatly influenced the writing of the American Constitution and the creation of the U.S. Government.
The correct answer is perceived risk.
A perceived risk refers to the uncertainty and doubt a person experiences when deciding to purchase a good or service. In this instance, Kathy has already had a history of disappointing haircuts. Due to this, in order to minimize the perceived risk of another bad, Kathy is <span>spending considerable effort finding a new hair stylist by doing her research and asking strangers with hair similar to hers. </span>
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Manipulating emotion is often very effective to influence consumers' behavior through ads. People tend to be more likely to purchase a certain product if they believe they will feel positive emotion after purchasing the product rather than objectively determining Tehran the product is beneficial for them.
It's true that this technique can be considered borderline unethical.
<u>But, this is very hard to prove.</u> Which make it impossible for the government to make laws that prevent it.
For example,
You can really proof that a certain image in the ads is making people sad since different people can feel wide variety of emotion even when they're seeing the same thing.
