Answer:
The answer is autonomy.
Explanation:
Both Ryan and Deci were interested in autonomy as a motor for wellness: it made sense for them that people enjoyed doing something in which they could get their best experience and achieve their best performance. In other words, autonomy refers to an internal motivation for doing any given activity. This is, doing something because we want to do it.
Answer:
c. temporal precedence
Explanation:
Temporal precedence is one among the three criterias that leads to a cause and effect relationship.
A temporal precedence entails that the criteria for assessing causation is that the causal variable must Precede the effect it is supposed
to cause.
This simply implies that the cause must come before the effect.
Hence, Mida trying to ensure that the cause of low grade was because of social, and making sure that social media comes before low grade. This is putting the cause of the low grade before the effect.
Therefore, the experiment is an example of temporal precedence research.
Answer:
This is an example of top-down processing.
Explanation:
Top-down processing allows us to make sense of information that has already been brought in by the senses, working downward from initial impressions down to lower-level senses. This is also known as conceptually-driven processing since your perceptions are influenced by expectations, existing beliefs, and understanding. In some cases, you are aware of these influences, but in other instances, this process occurs without conscious awareness. In this case the existing understanding concepts are: Oscar movies and Psychology.
Answer: A
Explanation:
In the late 1600 both France and Spain had control over it.
It means that religion will never meddle with running the nation, and it can't figure out who's chosen for specific positions and who isn't. For instance, they can't dismiss qualified possibility for having distinctive religious convictions.
The No Religious Test Clause of the United States Constitution is a proviso inside Article VI, Clause 3. By its plain terms, no administrative officeholder or worker can be required to cling to or acknowledge a specific religion or tenet as an essential to holding a bureaucratic office or a national government work. It promptly pursues a provision requiring all government and state officers to take a pledge or attestation to help the Constitution. This statement contains the main express reference to religion in the first seven articles of the U.S. Constitution.
