Answer:
D | The option 'put a higher tax on sugar' was not part of the Intolerable Acts.
Explanation:
The Intolerable Acts was not included with the Sugar Act.
Therefore, the Sugar Act put a higher tax on sugar while the Intolerable Acts did not.
The actions taken by white southern "redeemers" to undo the progress accomplished during the Civil War's Reconstruction era. They aimed to regain their political power and uphold white supremacy.
What is redeemers?
A redeemer is someone who redeems, which means they pay back, get their money back, save money, or swap something for something else.
By identifying the topics that would bring white southerners together in support of the objective of taking back control of Congress, they reached compromises.
The Democratic Party served as the Redeemers. The majority of white Southerners were shocked by the outcome and emancipation. Both the loss of loved ones and the devastation of property has affected many families.
As a result, they aimed to regain their political power and uphold white supremacy.
Learn more about on redeemers, here:
brainly.com/question/17494809
#SPJ1
True, it all depends on the influence of the King and Queen and on the constitution, because their rules must follow a constitution.
hope this helps
He accomplished many things such as becoming a renound politician before becoming president.
For the answer to the question above, are you referring to colonial period?
because during the colonial period, European women in America remained entitled to the legal protections provided by imperial authorities, even when they occupied unfree statuses, such as indentured servitude. For instance, when masters or mistresses mistreated their indentured servant women physically violated the terms of their labor contracts, the servants had a right to complain at the local court for redress; in some jurisdictions, their pleas met with remedies from the bench. Nevertheless, patriarchal models of authority prevailed, and despite their access to the courts, indentured women remained restricted by a series of laws that gave their masters extensive powers over them. They could not marry or travel while under contract, and if they ran away, became pregnant, or challenged their masters, they would be penalized with extra terms of service. While the law in Virginia, for instance, penalized masters who impregnated their servant women by freeing the latter, at the same time the statute averred that such women might be unfairly “induced to lay all their illegitimate to their masters” in order to gain their freedom. The statutory language is clearly indicative of class-based notions of dissolute sexuality. Indeed, the statutes enacted across imperial North America, like those iterated above, were devoted to creating and enforcing differences among women on the basis of not only race but class as well.
