which of the following describes a reason historians might want to use a primary source to study an event

1 answer:

5 0

A primary source comes from someone who lived during the time of the event or they were at the event. The reason why historians want primary source is because it is more likely to be factual and will give the best information. For example, at the signing of the declaration of independence several of the men who signed it wrote diaries . That would be considered a primary source, because those men were there and saw it as well as documented the event.
<span />

You might be interested in

Location A is _____.

Artemon [7]

I assume it's closest to Syria

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

To what does the term “Restoration” refer?the restoration of New York to English power

IRINA_888 [86]

The correct answer is C. The restoration of Charles II to the English throne

Explanation:

In English history, the Restoration began in 1660 and implied the return of Charles II as a king to the English throne as a result of restoring different monarchies including the Irish and Scottish under Charles II. This situation was mainly caused due to the Wars of the Three Kingdoms or the war that emerged between Englan, Ireland, and Scotland that led to the exile of Charles in 1646. However, on April of 1660 Charles II reclaimed the throne and this which was later approved by the Convention Parliament in Englan Additionally, this period also affect other fields including literature and art and reaffirmed the Protestantism in England. Therefore, the term Restoration refers to the restoration of Charles II to the English throne.

7 0

3 years ago

What two things did netherland and pennsylvania have in common?

Artyom0805 [142]

-They both practiced religious tolerance.

- There also the middle Colonies

4 0

3 years ago

Which statement best describes the Indian

xeze [42]

A) The act forcibly relocated eastern American Indians to Indian Territory west of the Mississippi River

I can't really explain it, that's just what the treaty stated.

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What cultural and emotional effects do you think the jews involved in the holocaust felt?

Svetach [21]

Answer:

As for culture, the Jews famously denied most of what was happening to them as far as persecution goes towards the beginning of the Holocaust. After it got worse (camps etc.) Emotionally, the Jews were along the same level as dirt. Some even believed the lies that were spread through Hitler's propaganda and when taken to camps gave up. The loud and merry life of the Jewish holidays were taken away completely removing almost all Jewish culture during and a long way after the Holocaust. Loss and seclusion for the survivors brought PTSD and many other mental illnesses. So as far as culture and emotions go, Jews in the Holocaust is probably as bad as it gets.

Explanation:

Nazis go brr

5 0

3 years ago