Answer: Thank you! I'll take a look at your question. :)
Have a great day!
Answer:No it wouldn't require any food labeling because these are an exception when it comes to food labeling as stated by the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990(NLEA)
Explanation:Nutrition labeling applies to grocery shops and restaurants where people do their most eating and food shopping daily , this is done so that a person can make a health choice and food companies can be challenged to improve nutrition in their brands of food.
Nutrition Labeling--Exemptions
Under NLEA, some foods are exempt from nutrition labeling such as food which is only bought for immediate consumption such as food sold in hospital cafeterias , airplanes , and food service vendors such as small cookies.
Ready to eat told even if it is not for immediate consumption but it is cooked just right there such as baked goods ,deli and candy
Also food given to consumers for nutritional purposes.
Any consideration of the human body carries with it the implication of the divide, real or perceived, between sacred and secular art.
The meanings and functions of the numerous points at which art and religion converge are investigated in studies of visual representations of the human body. Any consideration of the human body carries with it the implication of the divide, real or perceived, between sacred and secular art. The artistic and religious aspects of the human form reveal societal norms and ideals regarding gender, figurative art, and the interaction between the human and divine. The fundamental question is whether religious art must depict human figures.
Learn more about human body from
brainly.com/question/817274
#SPJ4
Answer:
1
The action of Pfizer is no way near an ethical act and was a clear violation of the ethical standards.This is true because
- As it is the company responsibility to act ethically to achieve the goals of the society by eradicating their problems and not by enhancing them hence the corporate social responsibility would not allow the company to behave inhumanly
- The duty based ethics would also empower the corporation to care and respect humanity
- Its is highly unethical on the part of Pfizer to conduct test on human life.if we consider the six basic guidelines to make ethical decisions then they have done it in a highly unethical manner.The six basic guidelines would never allow any company to behave i such a manner so as to risk the human life
Pfizer did not obey any of the above ethical standards and the conduct was clear violation of ethical standard.
2
Pfizer plc is not guilty of any ethical standard violation as it is a common practice for drug manufacturer to conduct tests on animals as well as human.And anyways the company conducted the tests on those human beings who will die with the epidermic which has already invaded the entire country of Nigeria.Hence in other to save/protect a large number of human being the test on the few persons is ethical as it is done to protect the society at large
So we cannot say that the company had violated any ethical standard
3
In order for Pfizer to avert the consequences of the violation then Pfizer should use the following five steps to create solution tom problem on ethical question these steps include
- Inquiry : It is very crucial to make initial inquiry about the entire subject matter
- Discussion: If there is a list of action generated after inquiry then discussion on every single action should be made
- Decision : It is highly crucial to take any decision with the consensus of all the participating candidates
- Justification : Each decision made must have a justification for the entire process
- Evaluation : it is highly crucial to evaluate the entire process
Explanation:
