Answer: Because Sweet Nothings is an expository piece of writing.
Explanation:
Kowalski, the author of Sweet Nothings presents evidence to support weight loss and refute weight loss because her writing is an expository piece of writing.
An expository piece of writing just as the name implies is one that exposes readers to a particular idea or topic. It’s purpose is to inform about and describe a particular subject or idea.
Kowalski, the author of Sweet Nothings may have been expected to stick to a particular side of the subject, that is either present evidence that supports weight loss or the one that refutes weight loss.
Instead, she presented both because her writing is an expository piece informing her readers about the both the advantages and disadvantages of weight loss.
Answer:
I am very confuzoled by this I don't wanna say question so statement
They would be the first birds to fly there.
<span>It builds suspense in the story, and it describes Jerry’s insecurity for the audience.</span>
Incomplete question. However, I assumed you are referring to the article <em>"An Inspector Calls and J B Priestley’s political journey" </em>by Alison Cullingford.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In that article the five words that Cullingford uses to describe the ‘golden age' were:
- freedom,
- plenty,
- hospitality,
- conviviality,
- generosity.
He uses such words in other to highlight the contrasts between past experiences and the present one in which Bradford found himself.
