Infamy is being known for something bad, like being infamous. Being known for a vile/terrible act. Kinda like what serial killers are, they’re known for their infamy
Answer:
1. In<u>ductive argument</u>.
2. <u>Inductive argument.</u>
3. <u>Deductve argument.</u>
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
The statement above is FALSE. A summary judgement is not granted only if there is no genuine question of law. Also, it should include the existing party or group was privileged or entitled to the judgement as a matter of law.
The answer to your question has to be B
Answer:
<h2>I'm fine just let me know when you are welcome</h2>
