Answer:
An optimistic person would be stable.
Explanation:
an optimistic person is always sure about his or her success.
The action being shown in the scenario given above is called
political patronage. This is a reward given to an individual when they were
able to obtain a prestige or benefits when the individual has served or given a
favor to an official and because of that, they are likely to be offered with a
reward.
In addition to the conflict, interactionist, and functionalist perspectives, a fourth sociological perspective on racial and ethnic prejudice is known as: <u>feminist theory</u>.
There are four main sociological perspectives on racial and ethnic prejudice. They are symbolic interactionism theory, social conflict theory, structural-functional theory and feminist theory.
One of the main sociological theories, the Symbolic Interactionism Theory, is based on how our interpersonal interactions and communal experiences convey various symbols and meanings.
Social conflict theory explains the inequality of classes, how human conduct is divided into two classes—the higher or powerful class and the inferior class.
According to structural-functional theory, society is a complex, linked system in which every component contributes to the overall functionality of the system.
Feminism fights for gender equality because it sees men and women as typically being treated unfairly in society. It's a common misconception that feminist movements are led by a gang of enraged women who want to rule over males.
To learn more about racial and ethnic prejudice refer
brainly.com/question/2811665
#SPJ4
Politicians often use the divisions that are already in society as a strategy to gain political support. This is even more evident in cases like that of the United States, where racial divisions are very prominent in voting patterns.
This approach can have very negative consequences for the community. For example, it can isolate voters from races that are not very prominent or are not considered a political force. Also, it can exacerbate the divisions already existent between different racial groups. Finally, it can create separation even within a single racial group, as it can fragment the group into different political factions.
Oil, fuel. Is that what your asking? I don't get it.
