Answer:
A zero coupon bond:
A. is sold at a large premium.
B. has a price equal to the future value of the face amount given a positive rate of return.
C. can only be issued by the U.S. Treasury.
D. has less interest rate risk than a comparable coupon bond.
E. has a market price that is computed using semiannual compounding of interest.
Answer is : B
Explanation:
In classification of bonds we have a unique type of bond known as Zero-coupon bonds also know as Pure discount bonds, unlike traditional bonds they don’t pay coupon instead they are sold on discount basis and on maturity the bondholder receive a par value, for this reason the price will be at a discount on sale and on maturity be redeemed at par price showing a positive rate of return.
I believe it meant both alien immigrants and non-alien immigrants? Is this the correct context, immigration? Or, does it mean extra-terrestrial life? I would need to see context to know for sure, but I believe it is referencing immigration.
Answer:
Yes this sequence of transaction is considered as a day trade.
Explanation:
As per the definition of the day trading, <em>Day trading is defined as the purchase and sale of a security within a single trading day. It can occur in any marketplace but is most common in the foreign exchange (forex) and stock markets.</em>
As per this definition, the trading has to be done such that the purchase and sale is made on the same day. As indicated in the question ,this is the case so the given sequence of transactions is a day trade.
Answer:
The answer is "choice a"
Explanation:
In the given question the missing choices is added in attached file please find it.
The additional output produced through hiring an extra item of such an input reflects the marginal product (MP). For the very first time. for example, its marginal labor productivity was increased output generated by recruiting additional work.
This law diminishing marginal returns as more as units that even the marginal result of even an input, that is hired input.
In other words, any additional work input would generate less than a previous employee because recruiting additional workers decreases expected revenue on jobs, the laid-off of employees, which means the Labor would grow expected revenue.
In Japan is laying off fewer employees even despite the slowdown it continues to produce strong outputs. The lower-priced revenues and their work remain constant along with their steady overall performance.
Your medium product (total) item divided by total work would stay intact. United states staff layover to the other side. It laid-off the staff equals higher marginal labor for overall returns it's going to be higher production besides that, lower labor in the United States could mean an increase in the gross labor output but a larger for Japan, more then, that's why the choice a is correct.
I'm so sorry I don't know hopefully someone will help u