Answer: b). falls from a positive amount to another positive amount
Explanation: Given that diet coke and diet pepsi give the consumer equal level of satisfaction. Diet coke and diet pepsi are substitutes, since, the consumer does not care about consuming diet pepsi and diet coke. For substitute goods the consumer will buy the cheapest of the two. When pdc (price of diet coke) rises but it remains less than pdp(price of diet pepsi) then the consumption of dc will decrease but it will still be above the consumption of dp. Since it is still relatively less expensive than diet pepsi. So the consumer will buy diet coke than diet pepsi, which means consumption of diet coke, dc falls from one positive amount to another positive amount.
Answer:
As a part of CSR initiatives (or purely governmental), nurturing environmental beneficial factors is always a plus for the whole economy.
Decreasing pollution can further improve the tourism sector, and change property values by encouraging real estate in "green areas". Clean energy initiatives (wind and solar energy) have the ability to transform the whole energy industry, which is the input for most economy processes and businesses.
Answer:
D) Marginal utility of the last unit of each product consumed is the same.
Explanation:
To maximize utility with a given income constraint, a consumer must chose products to maximize utility. This can be done so that each extra dollar, which is the marginal income, spent on each of these products yields the equal marginal utility. For example if one product yields more marginal utility per marginal dollar spent, the consumer should reallocate their income so they consume more of this product and less of others, so much so that the utility derived from this product equals utility derived from other products.
Utility is maximized when these marginal utilities per marginal dollar spent coincide.
Hope that helps.
Answer:
b. Greenwashing
Explanation:
Greenwashing refers to misleading customers by portraying fake compliance with environmental laws by a company. In such cases the company at fault showcases it's products as environmental friendly, made using natural ingredients which actually is not the case.
Misleading refers to employing fraudulent practices intended to deceive the customers with an intention to increase the sales volume.
In the given case, the company in question labelled it's products as environmental friendly despite knowing such is not the case as the facts suggest otherwise.
Thus, this is a case of Greenwashing.
