Well, I am not really good at writing, you know. But I know who will be able to help you with it. Personally, I use the help of Supreme essay guys. They usually both proofread and edit my papers. Those guys are real professionals in what they do. Good luck!
Answer:
Explanation:
Sustenence is the word
the one that feeds my soul
The one that pumps my existence
Sustenence is the nurishment,
that fuels my being
It gives me hope
It gives me courage
It can be love, or perhaps a goodnight's rest
It can be the tender kiss of mum,
or the harsh words of a teacher
For sustience is everything that drives me
It makes me so sad that people will do that
With the help of inductive reasoning, he reached the conclusion that segregation laws are all unjust.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the three part deductive statement, the major premise was all the laws that degrade the human personality are unjust. The minor premise was segregation laws degrade the human personality and therefore the conclusion was that the segregation laws are unjust.
This conclusion has been derived from the evidences like the hate filled policemen kick brothers and sisters. African American caught in an airtight prison of poverty. They were excluded from amusement parks. All this degraded the human personality and were unjust.
The evidence that the author used to support faulty analogy in the text is <u>some people talk to their plants to help them grow</u>
According to the excerpt, the narrator talks about plants and hamsters and their similarities and differences. He deceptively compares them by saying that a hamster requires attention from its owner, usually by talking, but plants cando fine without needing anybody to talk to them.
Faulty analogy is a type of fallacy that makes use of deceptive comparisons to attempt to prove a point.
Therefore, the evidence that the author used to support faulty analogy in the text is <u>some people talk to their plants to help them grow</u>
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/4025909
