An original criticism is that Kantian ethics is said to be doomed to be nothing or empty and also rigidly same in terms of its prescriptions and it is one where the complaints cannot be seen as true.
<h3>What is the good thing according to Kant?</h3>
We need to look into them on equal moral ground based on the will that is behind their actions.
The only thing that is good and one that is without qualification is said to be good will and that was what Kant says and this is what i agree with.
Hence, An original criticism is that Kantian ethics is said to be doomed to be nothing or empty and also rigidly same in terms of its prescriptions and it is one where the complaints cannot be seen as true.
Learn more about criticism from
brainly.com/question/2947946
#SPJ1
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You do not include any reference to what argument, text, or paper written by James Madison, because he wrote many as part of the authors of the Federalists papers.
However, probably you are referring to "Federalist N.-10." If this is the case, then the correct answer is the following.
Madison used the comparison to bolster his argument in that he compares two forms of government: Republic and Pure Democracy. In that comparison, James Madison says that the wrongdoings and failures of Pure Democracy represent the benefits of a Republic. So he tries to promote the idea of a Republic as the new form of government for the new nation.
How many hours is it because if it’s $15 dollars an hours how much hours is it
Answer:
We quickly begin conserving resources and educating people about the rainforest so we can preserve this unique ecosystem.
Hope this helps! :)
