1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marina CMI [18]
3 years ago
12

Some scholars Why did the Puritans leave England for America?

History
1 answer:
Temka [501]3 years ago
3 0
<span>The Puritans separated from the churches in their local parishes where preaching was viewed as inadequate, hiring their own lecturers who were well-versed in reform theology. These lecturers were prosecuted by the monarch and Church of England officials. The last straw may have been when King Charles I dissolved Parliament in 1629. This dissolution prevented Puritan leaders from working within the system to effect change and left them vulnerable to persecution. Moderate Puritans chartered the Massachusetts Bay Colony in the same year. The New World represented both a refuge from persecution and an opportunity to establish a “Zion in the wilderness.” Puritans imagined their migration to the New World mirrored the Biblical story of Exodus. Between 1629 and 1640, over 20,000 men, women and children left England to settle permanently in the Massachusetts Bay Colony in the Americas. When Parliament was re-established in 1640, migration dropped drastically.</span>
You might be interested in
How would you describe the life in the court of suleiman the magnificent court
DochEvi [55]
The Europeans called him "The Magnificent," but the Ottomans called him Kanuni, or "The Lawgiver." The Suleymanie Mosque, built for Suleyman, describes Suleyman in its inscription as Nashiru kawanin al-Sultaniyye , or "Propagator of the Sultanic Laws." The primacy of Suleyman as a law-giver is at the foundation of his place in Islamic history and world view. It is perhaps important to step back a moment and closely examine this title to fully understand Suleyman's place in history.

The word used for law here, kanun, has a very specific reference. In Islamic tradition, the Shari'ah, or laws originally derived from the Qur'an , are meant to be universally applied across all Islamic states. No Islamic ruler has the power to overturn or replace these laws. So what laws was Suleyman "giving" to the Islamic world? What precisely does kanun refer to since it doesn't refer to the main body of Islamic law, the Shari'ah ?

The kanun refer to situational decisions that are not covered by the Shari'ah . Even though the Shari'ah provides all necessary laws, it's recognized that some situations fall outside their parameters. In Islamic tradition, if a case fell outside the parameters of the Shari'ah , then a judgement or rule in the case could be arrived at through analogy with rules or cases that are covered by the Shari'ah . This method of juridical thinking was only accepted by the most liberal school of Shari'ah , Hanifism, so it is no surprise that Hanifism dominated Ottoman law.

The Ottomans, however, elevated kanun into an entire code of laws independent of the Shari'ah. The first two centuries of Ottoman rule, from 1350 to 1550, saw an explosion of kanun rulings and laws, so that by the beginning of the sixteenth century, the kanun were a complete and independent set of laws that by and large were more important than the Shari'ah . This unique situation was brought about in part because of the unique heritage of the Ottomans. In both Turkish and Mongol traditions, the imperial law, or law pronounced by the monarch, was considered sacred. They even had a special word for it: the Turks called it Türe and the Mongols called it Yasa . In the system of Türe and Yasa , imperial law was regarded as the essential and sacred foundation of the empire. When this tradition collided with the Islamic Shari'ah tradition, a compromised system combining both was formed.

The Sultanic laws were first collected together by Mehmed the Conqueror. Mehmed divided the kanun into two separate sets or laws. The first set dealt with the organization of government and the military, and the second set dealt with the taxation and treatment of the peasantry. The latter group was added to after the death of Mehmed and the Ottoman kanun pretty much crystallized into its final form in 1501. Suleyman, for his part, revised the law code, but on the whole the Suleyman code of laws is pretty identical to the 1501 system of laws. However, it was under Suleyman that the laws took their final form; no more revisions were made after his reign. From this point onwards, this code of laws was called, kanun-i 'Osmani , or the "Ottoman laws."

Hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
The Supreme Court case Marbury v. Maddison happend because
Vesna [10]

A democratic- republican refused to appoint a Federalist

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Between 1900 and 2006 total world steel production increased or decreased
Semenov [28]
It has increased.

In 2006, the United States produced more steel than it did in 1900, but China was the world's leading steel producer in 2006.
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was an advantage the North had over the South?
IceJOKER [234]
I am pretty sure it is b
3 0
3 years ago
Why did some Americans support joining World War 2​
Deffense [45]

Answer:

Because pearl harbor was bombed and now it was affecting them and they were already on the edge of joining but the main reason is pearl harbor.

Explanation:

hope it helps.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is a confederation
    13·2 answers
  • Which was the first Roman genre that permitted women to act on stage A)melodrama B)farce C)mime D)pantomime
    9·2 answers
  • In the 19th century, what were the two patterns of intergroup relations native americans were subjected to by the dominant white
    11·1 answer
  • Who has economic power in free market?
    8·2 answers
  • Renaissance artists wanted to celebrate human _________
    10·1 answer
  • Columbus sailed west in an effort to find a quicker route to: The United States, India, Greece, Austrailia​
    7·1 answer
  • No freeman shall be taken or imprisoned or deprived wrongfully or exiled or in any way destroyed, nor will we go upon him nor se
    7·1 answer
  • Question 1<br> Who is John J. Sirica?
    6·2 answers
  • Influenced by the chaotic time in which he lived, this school wanted to bring good government and stability to the people. He be
    5·1 answer
  • (PLEASE HELP I NEED TO PASS,GIVING BRAIN)!!!Why did European nations help the Qing government put down the Taiping Rebellion?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!