Answer:
Austin told them there could be no peaceful solution with Mexico
Explanation:
Following the release of Stephen F. Austin from prison in 1835 after being imprisoned for instigation and insurrection he returned to Texas and addressed his fellow Texians at a meeting. During the meeting, he told them that there could be no peaceful solution with Mexico.
This was evident in his speech when he said "The revolution in Mexico is drawing to a close. The object is to change the form of government, destroy the federal constitution of 1824, and establish a central or consolidated government..."
The two different arguments present the two different angles of the society.
Explanation:
The first angle shows the political and geographical issues that led to the fall of the Roman empire while the other shows the more human, and in a way, unknowable form of why the empire declined.
People become luxurious and peace loving in richer states because they have access to the riches. The government also faces stronger discontent because the people expect better amenities.
At the same time, an empire cannot fall if the rot is not in the government so the two reasons did work together.
Answer: The revolution also failed to limit the power of parliaments and created no body of protected constitutional law. Therefore the Septennial Act of 1716 was able to effectively undermine the terms of the 1694 Triennial Act, ushering in the lengthy rule of a Whig oligarchy.
Hope this helps...
Well, first off that's gross.
The recessive gene showed up more in the royalty because if a close relative such as a first cousin would carry the same genetics as the spouse, because likely the grandfather or grandmother had the disease. The commoners would not do that because they are marrying in the family.