Answer:
The First Amendment protects against abridgements of the "freedom of speech." Although in many cases the question of whether speech has been regulated is not in doubt, as with most restrictions on oral or written communication, in some it is an important threshold issue for courts to consider. If the regulated activity is not "speech," then it is not protected by the First Amendment and there is no need to extend the constitutional analysis further.
Explanation:
The correct answer is D. By describing an example of how money could be stolen and sent abroad
Explanation:
In the excerpt presented, the author explains a hypothetical situation in which a bank is asked through e.mail to transfer the funds of a client to a different bank account, about this, the author remarks as e-mails do not have a handwritten signature it would not be possible for the bank to know whether the e-mail is written by the owner of the account or a criminal and then ends the text with the main claim or idea that is "it is essential that there is some form of reliable digital signature", this means the information presented before the claim support this by providing a hypothetical situation or an example of the consequences of not having a reliable digital signature and the way money could be stolen as a consequence. Therefore, the author supports the claim by describing an example of how money could be stolen and sent abroad.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure it's false too
Explanation:
Like why would they let foreign journalists get up in their business when they don't even let the journalists who are citizens of that country report that stuff
Hope you get it right! Good luck!
That magazine contains many different kinds of stories and articles.