A = pi * r^2 A = 3.14 * 50^2 A = 7,850 square miles (area of the 50 mile broadcast signal)
A = pi * r^2A = 3.14 * 75^2A = 17,662.5 = 17,663 square miles (area of the 75 mile relayed signal)
Now we just need to subtract the 50 mile signal from the 75 mile signal, so:
17,663 - 7,850 = 9,813 square miles greater
Hope this helps :)
Read more on Brainly -
brainly.com/sf/question/1928889
Answer:
The long reach of the past seems to in any case to be causing the Kremlin some uneasiness. The impacts of the interruption related with the October Upheaval and the resulting arrangement of the Soviet Association infiltrated all aspects of Russian life. A profound association with the past is as yet felt by numerous conventional Russians. I caught a lady in her mid sixties indignantly taking steps to cast a ballot against Vladimir Putin in the impending races since he wouldn't commend the October Unrest. These sentiments are subsiding, however gradually, writes Alexander Nekrassov.
The centennial year of the October Upset showed that the Kremlin is dismissing the Soviet progressive heritage. The Russian state, itself to a great extent a progressive heritage, likes to see in 1917 examination material to evaluate and to gain from. The authority approach currently is to instruct another age of Russians who never commended the October Transformation.
Explanation:
Answer: she is my Aunt
Explanation: She works in Michigan as a nurse
Explanation:
As governance indicators have proliferated in recent years, so has their use and the controversy that surrounds them. As more and more voices are pointing out, existing indicators – many of them developed and launched in the 1990s – have a number of flaws. This is particularly disquieting at a time when governance is at the very top of the development agenda.
Many questions of crucial importance to the development community – such as issues around the relationship between governance and (inclusive) growth, or about the effectiveness of aid in different contexts – are impossible to answer with confidence as long as we do not have good enough indicators, and hence data, on governance.
The litany of problems concerning existing governance indicators has been growing:
Indicators produced by certain NGOs (e.g. the Heritage Foundation), but also by commercial risk rating agencies (such as the PRS Group), are biased towards particular types of policies, and consequently, the assessment of governance becomes mingled with the assessment of policy choices;
Many indicators rely on surveys of business people (e.g. the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey). While they have important insights into governance challenges given their interaction with government bureaucracies, the views of other stakeholders are also important and remain underrepresented, as are concerns about governance of less relevance to the business community (e.g. civil and human rights);
The other main methodology used are indicators produced by individuals or small groups of external experts – for example, the World Bank’s Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA), Bertelsmann’s Transformation Index, and the French Development Agency’s Institutional Profiles. This entails the risk that different experts ‘feed’ on each other’s ratings; and the depth to which external raters are able to explore the dimensions they are rating can vary.
The Articles of Confederation were just a beginning outline of what the Constitution did.
The articles of Confederation had 2 omissions that the Constitution added.
1. There was no executive branch to enforce the laws
2. There was no judicial branch to interpret the law.
3. The Federal government couldn't collect taxes. They got their money from the states.
4. The Feds couldn't issue a standard currency. Each state had it's own.
5. Trade was not uniformly practiced by the states.
6. Often the states wouldn't pay the Federal Government because they feared other states wouldn't pay either.
7. The Constitution introduced a supremacy law where the laws of the Federal Government were above state law.
There were a couple of minor fixes
=============
8. Laws governing commerce between the states was introduced into the constitution
9. The federal government determined how trade was to be conducted between the states and other sovereign nations.
