There are a lot of answers to this question depending on
the given choices to choose from. So next time please be kind enough to include
the choices. I can give you three possible answers for this question, now it
all depends on you to choose which one of these three are in the choices:
Select 1:
1. Readers are forced to consider the possible monstrous
actions inside of themselves, like hatred or prejudice.
2. The monster challenges readers to recognize that a
monster could be an ordinary person, not just an outcast.
3. Readers must consider that monsters live among them, maybe
in their own town.
We can actually see that the commonality in the three
choices tells us that the monster does not really refer to the monsters
depicted in fiction. However, monsters could be just ordinary person, it could
even perhaps refer to us. What makes us a monster is our personality, not our
appearance.
<span> </span>
Examples of charged language in "The Immigrant Contribution" are
Charged languages are words that are meant to produce strong emotional feelings in the reader. They are laden with meaning and they can move an audience to action.
In the "Immigrant Contribution", John F. Kennedy used many charged languages as seen in these excerpts;
This could not have been done without the hard labor,...
...a challenge which subjected that idea to stern testing...
"Thus, the public schools became a powerful means of preparing the newcomers for American life".
These words have strong emotional implications that send ideas with great impact.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/13392026
Answer:
a) Yes, because it includes key ideas from the beginning, middle, and end, and it explains the conflict and the resolution.
Explanation:
