In <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
<h3>What was the place of evidence in the case of Mapp v. Ohio?</h3>
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the state in a 5-3 vote, favoring Mapp, from whom evidence was obtained without due process.
The implication is that evidence seized unlawfully from a suspect or an accused, without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions in state courts.
Thus, in <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
Learn more about the importance of evidence in criminal prosecutions at brainly.com/question/7802791
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer would be B, Spain.
Explanation:
Hernan Cortés claimed Mexico for Spain after conquering the Aztec Empire in 1915.
I hope this helps:)
A matrilineal society is one in which the lineage of an individual is based upon the mother's lineage. Therefore, descent is traced through the mother and the maternal ancestors. This has implications in regards to inheritance of property and/or titles.
Germany could no longer send or receive items from other countries through water helping the Allies with defeating the Axis.
Um if this is a true or false questionif it is it's true
