1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
coldgirl [10]
3 years ago
12

One way of defending our belief in a just world when we observe a victim suffering is to:

Social Studies
1 answer:
Vsevolod [243]3 years ago
4 0

QUESTION Options:

a.identify strongly with the victim.

b.disparage the victim.

c.disparage the oppressor.

d.become very concerned with our own situation out of fear of suffering in the future.

Answer: Disparage the victim.

A just world hypothesis is the assumption that an individual's action is naturally likely to bring morally fair results or actions to that individual such that all honourable actions are rewarded and and evil actions are punished.

To defend our belief in a just world, when we see an individual suffering, we conclude that the suffering is as a result of their evil actions.

You might be interested in
Why might american indians have protested the u.s. settlements
Anna007 [38]
The settlements were an invasion of their land. The settlers took food, space, and resources that they had no natural right to.
7 0
3 years ago
While eating at a restaurant, you see a waiter's serving tray tilt and an avalanche of food and beverages splatters on four peop
love history [14]
You have just committed an attributional bias called "the fundamental attribution error."

The fundamental attribution error is the inclination individuals need to overemphasize individual qualities and disregard situational factors in judging others' conduct. As a result of the fundamental attribution error, we have a tendency to trust that others do awful things since they are terrible individuals.
3 0
3 years ago
Can anyone plz hole me on this
vampirchik [111]

Answer:nos

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Explain how critical thinking can be used to analyze a philosophical issue.
lisabon 2012 [21]
<span>Critical thinking involves the engagement of the thinker in rational deliberation and a systematic or methodical investigation of facts and reasons. Such postulations normally consist of a number of premises and a conclusion. The premises provide reasons in support of the conclusion or position taken by the argument. This can facilitate rational evaluation of philosophical claims.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
The Old San Antonio Road stretched from Louisiana, through Texas, and into __________.
stira [4]
D . The Gulf of Mexico is the answer .
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Psychology is not just a common sense study of behavior it must be an _____ study
    5·1 answer
  • What is the great “myth” that is commonly held in North America regarding the reason for the establishment of a taboo against fi
    13·1 answer
  • Land, Labor and Entrepreneurship are all of the factors of production.
    14·1 answer
  • Where did the largest civil rights protest in the 1960s take place?
    14·1 answer
  • The partricains were the ruling class in Ancient Rome right??
    6·2 answers
  • Enrique believes that males should always be the ones to ask females out on dates. He thinks that if a man accepts an invitation
    5·1 answer
  • Why were taxes on ongoing source of conflict for the American colonists?
    9·2 answers
  • What two things did Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibit
    13·1 answer
  • Claim rights or positive rights a. are rights to act without interference b. are guaranteed in the First Amendment impose c. an
    9·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND 20 POINTS!!!
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!