Answer:
War and losing allies
Explanation:
Although taking over more land may be better, these countries being taken over or turned democratic may result in that country waging war. also other allies of the acting party may also leave because those allies don't want anything to do with other countries purely trying to protect themselves. a good example of this is us Americans. *he he.
So if you go around the world and talk about america around business owners and politicians, they'll be likely to shun you for it, because we are likely to police the world in any way we can trying to eliminate communism. This results in few allies and many enemies. Hope this helps.
Answer:
lado muji kati lamo question hi harr
Answer:
Would not be able to speak freely in public.
Explanation:
EX: U.S does not have a unlimited government, hence why do you think its a free country.
Answer:
The church was probably one of the most rich and powerful things during the middle ages. The church was a driving force for religious people, and most religious people would give the church a ton of money during their lifetime. People paid 1/10's of their earnings to the church, which were called tithes, basically donations to the church which supported them. They also paid for events, like baptism, marriage and communion. The church was considered independent, so they were not taxed, and the wealthy often gave the church land. The church ended up owning 1/3 of the land in Western Europe, and Western Europe was heavily dominated by Christianity. The church had a strong political power during these times because people would follow what the church wanted, due to them having all this power. Wealthy politicians would also pay indulgences to "buy their way into heaven", and the threat of not going to heaven was enough to make politicians do their bidding during this time.
Explanation:
Personal Freedom can only be guaranteed in a rule where the person can decide who rules.
Explanation:
In communism the state has the highest power, over the people.
That means that the state can decide when to restrict the movement of the people or to take away their personal freedom from them if the state deigns it so.
In democracy that is not possible.
The personal freedom of movement and of expression are some of the inalienable rights of a true democracy.
No matter what happens these are the rights that are enshrined to a democracy safeguarded by the elections.
