1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergio039 [100]
2 years ago
9

Can you plz help with this?

History
2 answers:
Airida [17]2 years ago
5 0

Answer: Your answer is b

Explanation:Give me the brainiest

grin007 [14]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

B.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Who is Statesman Wilfred Laurier?
dedylja [7]

Sir Wilfrid Laurier. Sir Wilfrid Laurier, prime minister of Canada 1896–1911, lawyer, journalist, politician (born 20 November 1841 in St-Lin, Canada East; died 17 February 1919 in Ottawa, ON ). As leader of the Liberal Party 1887–1919 and prime minister 1896–1911, Laurier was the dominant political figure of his era.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How far was Nasser responsible for the outbreak of the Suez War of 1956? Please make it detailed i have to write a 600 word essa
dsp73

Answer:

The Suez crisis is often portrayed as Britain's last fling of the imperial dice.

Still, there were powerful figures in the "establishment" - a phrase coined in the early 1950s - who could not accept that Britain was no longer a first-rate power. Their case, in the context of the times, was persuasive: we had nuclear arms, a permanent seat on the UN security council, and military forces in both hemispheres. We remained a trading nation, with a vital interest in the global free passage of goods.

But there was another, darker, motive for intervention in Egypt: the sense of moral and military superiority which had accreted in the centuries of imperial expansion. Though it may now seem quaint and self-serving, there was a widespread and genuine feeling that Britain had responsibilities in its diminishing empire, to protect its peoples from communism and other forms of demagoguery.

Much more potently, there was ingrained racism. When the revolutionaries in Cairo dared to suggest that they would take charge of the Suez canal, the naked prejudice of the imperial era bubbled to the surface. The Egyptians, after all, were among the original targets of the epithet, "westernised oriental gentlemen. They were the Wogs.

King Farouk, the ruler of Egypt, was forced into exile in mid-1952. A year later, a group of army officers formally took over the government which they already controlled. The titular head of the junta was General Mohammed Neguib. The real power behind the new throne was an ambitious and visionary young colonel who dreamed of reasserting the dignity and freedom of the Arab nation, with Egypt at the heart of the renaissance. His name was Gamal Abdel Nasser.

Nasser's first target was the continued British military presence in the Suez canal zone. A source of bitter resentment among many Egyptians, that presence was a symbol of British imperial dominance since the 1880s. In 1954, having established himself as uncontested leader of Egypt, Nasser negotiated a new treaty, under which British forces would leave within 20 months.

At first, the largely peaceful transition of power in Egypt was little noticed in a world beset by turmoil and revolution.

Explanation:

Hope this helps.

7 0
3 years ago
What was the country's Staple in The South Before in The south before The great migration
-Dominant- [34]
The answer to your question is cotton
hope this helps
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did some people support supply-side economics and others opposed it?
vovikov84 [41]

Answer:

Explanation:

I don't see how this is possible, but the answer seems to be A which is the only answer that makes sense.

Large tax cuts don't have anything to do with supply of goods. It does help consumption but that is not the same thing as supply side economics.

C is much truer for the aftermath of WWI than a general statement about Supply. I don't think it is the right answer.

It didn't call for increased government spending unless the government wanted the goods being produced.

I think I'd go with A. It is the most straight forward.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Fun facts<br><br> During your lifetime, you will produce enough saliva to fill two swimming pools
astra-53 [7]

Fun facts.

If you find a machine which goes in a speed of 3×10^8 m/sec, you can see the past and future. You can even travel for longer distant objects like stars

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which term refers to the members of a church that was founded by Joseph Smith, who was later succeeded by Brigham Young?
    9·2 answers
  • Why can't you never see The Far Side of the Moon from the Earth​
    6·2 answers
  • Why were industrial and agricultural surpluses a problem for the US economy?
    9·2 answers
  • According to Mahavira, the founder of Jainism, what led to the souls of all objects, animate or inanimate, being enmeshed in mat
    15·1 answer
  • Why do some people consider the way the media cover candidates for public office bad for democracy? A. People tend to vote for t
    12·2 answers
  • How did creating the Department of Homeland Security address the concerns of the 9/11 Commission?
    12·2 answers
  • N. Y.<br> N.C.<br> JOIN,<br> or DI E.
    12·1 answer
  • BANSANG SINILANGAN,
    7·2 answers
  • John Austin, Henry Smith, and their forces went to Velasco to pick up cannons.
    9·2 answers
  • Acts are Judged by____<br><br> (islamic)
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!