by praising the efficiency of modern-day Internet research doesn't relate to anything regarding "Choreographers of Matter, Life, and Intelligence" when it comes to argumentation. Comparing scientific knowledge to grains of sand on a beach is poetic, but it is no argument either. Proving names of modern scientists and their contributions also shows nothing but the scientists and their contributions themselves. It doesn't work as proof for <em>"an impending scientific revolution".</em>
What Michio Kaku does, as the good scientist that he is, is to show evidence. And he does so "by providing quantitative proof of recent scientific progress"
Hey there! Is there anything you wanted to ask here?
Answer:
That black people are treated differently than white people.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Mike didn’t want to see the trash anymore. For more than one reason
1- it was distracting and it could cause harm
2-it was pollution and was harming to the animals in the lake
Answer:
someone a good
↓ ↓
Misterbigbrain bought a lawnmower at the hardware store.
Explanation:
