Answer: By discussing the notion of placing people into packages
Explanation: If you read a little more you will notice how the author in passage 2 starts to compare people to their birth order, and how simple it is to just based a person traits just by their birth order (he does this by stating that we can fit life histories into 3 or 4 little packages)
Sorry if it’s confusing
Answer:
C) genetic fallacy
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
A) fallacy of the single cause
B) reversing causal direction
C) genetic fallacy
D) slippery slope
This is an example of a genetic fallacy. A genetic fallacy is a fallacy or irrelevance. It is defined as a fallacy that is solely based on the origin of something rather than on the individual context of the situation. This typically transfers a good or bad reputation to the current context based on its origin. In this example, the speaker knows that the depletion of tuna is a consequence of overfishing. Therefore, it is true that the origin of the problem is the consumption of tuna. However, it is a fallacy to argue that any type of consumption is equally bad.
7y+3=4y-18
move 4y to the other side
sign changes from +4y to -4y
7y-4y+3= 4y-4y-18
7y-4y+3= -18
3y+3= -18
move 3 to the other side
3y+3-3= -18-3
3y= -21
divide both sides by 3 to get y by itself
3y/3= -21/3
answer:
y= -7
Answer: The Iliad is about strength and the Odyssey is about cunning
Explanation:
A difference that becomes apparent in the very first lines of the epics. Whereas the Iliad tells the story of the rage of Achilles, the strongest hero in the Greek army, the Odyssey focuses on a “man of twists and turns".
I have never heard of that. But Im more then glad to help if I can.
