Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
Be more specific leader for?
<span>The Third Amendment keeps soldiers from taking someone's home during peace time without the owner's consent. It also does the same during times of war as long as the rules of law are followed.</span>
Answer:
Graphs show a pattern in something that we are following. So by using those patterns on the graphs, we can see how the process that we are following is changing and we can conclude that without anything drastic happening the process will continue with the same pattern.
An example would be a pattern in weight loss. If a graph shows that a person is losing weight 1 pound per week we can conclude that the next week the person will have 1 pound less. This will only change if the person starts eating more which would be a drastic change to the pattern.
Answer: All of the following statements are true regarding a short sale <u>except:</u>
- Legal costs should be lower with a short sale than with foreclosure.
Explanation:
A short sale is when an owner <u>sells his house for less money than he owes </u>in the payment of the property. The homeowner negotiates a discounted payment with his mortgage company without having to arrive with cash to cover the deficit. At the end of a short sale, the mortgage and property liens will be considered satisfied and any foreclosure process will be stopped.
Foreclosures are made by people who really do not have the money and cannot settle small fees. Although this will give you more credit deductions, <u>you will save any fees charged.</u>
