1/555 of a mile. I did this by figuring out how many seconds it would take her to walk a full mile and then got the answer for 1 second
The researcher's scientific/alternative hypothesis is:
- Different sources of caffeine leads to differences in women's attentional control performance.
The researcher's null hypothesis is:
- Different sources of caffeine leads to no difference in women's attentional control performance.
The type of sample which the researcher is using is:
A disadvantage to using this sample type is:
The thing which the researcher can conclude about these data is:
- It is conclusive based on the reaction of the women to the independent variables.
If, in the population, women actually show NO difference in attentional control performance after drinking black tea versus coffee, the type of statistical error which the researcher has made is:
<h3>What is a Scientific Hypothesis?</h3>
This refers to the difference between two variables which is discovered during a scientific research and is an observed pattern.
Read more about scientific hypothesis here:
brainly.com/question/896413
Answer:
slope = 2
Step-by-step explanation:
Find 2 points on the line that land perfectly on the grid. I'll choose these 2 here:
(-2, -1) and (0, 3)
Rise is the change in the y value from one point to the other, and run is the change in the x. Looking at these 2 points, y went from -1 to 3. That is a <em>rise</em> of 4. The x went from -2 to 0, so that is a <em>run</em> of 2. "rise over run" means rise literally over run in a fraction like this:

The more proper way to calculate slope looks like this, but it's really the same thing in the end:

where (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) are your 2 points.
Finally, the slope of this line is:

That's a rise of 4 over a run of 2, and that simplifies to just a slope of 2.
(-1, 5) because if you plug in -1 to both equations, you should get 5 from both equations. They also cross at that point, making that the solution.
ASSUMING

is the expression to be factored.
where
a=1
b=-11
c=-60
We look for m, n such that m+n=b=-11, mn=c=-60.
It is possible to find m, n mentally, or compile a table as follows:
-1*60=-60, -1+60=59 > -11
-2*30=-60, -2+30=28 > -11
-3*20=-60, -3+20=17 > -11
-4*15=-60, -4+15=11 > -11
But 4*(-15)=-60, and 4-15=-11, exactly what we want!
So