Explain the steps you would need to take to find slope from data in a table.

A survey was conducted in the United Kingdom, where respondents were asked if they had a university degree. One question asked,

katovenus [111]

Answer:

$z=\frac{0.121-0.0892}{\sqrt{0.101(1-0.101)(\frac{1}{373}+\frac{1}{639})}}=1.620$

$p_v =2*P(Z>1.620)=0.105$

If we compare the p value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05$ always $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the two proportions are not statistically different at 5% of significance

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

$X_{1}=45$ represent the number of correct answers for university degree holders

$X_{2}=57$ represent the number of correct answers for university non-degree holders

$n_{1}=373$ sample 1 selected

$n_{2}=639$ sample 2 selected

$p_{1}=\frac{45}{373}=0.121$ represent the proportion of correct answers for university degree holders

$p_{2}=\frac{57}{639}=0.0892$ represent the proportion of correct answers for university non-degree holders

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the value for the test (variable of interest)

Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the proportions are different between the two groups, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} = p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} \neq p_{2}$

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}$ (1)

Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{45+57}{373+639}=0.101$

Calculate the statistic

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:

$z=\frac{0.121-0.0892}{\sqrt{0.101(1-0.101)(\frac{1}{373}+\frac{1}{639})}}=1.620$

Statistical decision

For this case we don't have a significance level provided $\alpha$ , but we can calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a one side test the p value would be:

$p_v =2*P(Z>1.620)=0.105$

If we compare the p value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05$ always $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the two proportions are not statistically different at 5% of significance

7 0

3 years ago

Please help!!<br>show work!!<br>please!!

Advocard [28]

$\frac{1}{1} * \frac{1}{3}$ would work.

4 0

3 years ago

Please Find the distance between the two points rounding to the nearest tenth (if necessary).

Sphinxa [80]

Answer:

10.29 u

Step-by-step explanation:

<u>Given :- </u>

Two points (7,4) and (-2,9) is given to us.

And we need to find out the distance between the two points . So , here we can use the distance formula to find out the distance. As,

$:\implies$ D = √{(x2-x1)² + (y2-y1)²}

$:\implies$ D =√[ (7+2)² +(9-4)²]

$:\implies$ D =√[ 9² +5²]

$:\implies$ D =√[ 81 +25]

$:\implies$ D = 10.29

<h3>Hence the distance between the two points is 10.29 units .</h3>

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A business buys a computer for $3,000. After 4 years the value of the computer is expected to be $250. The value, v, can be rela

yuradex [85]

You are given two points in the linear function. At time 0 years, the value is $3000. At time 4 years, the value is $250. This means you have points (0, 3000) and (4, 250). You need to find the equation of the line that passes through those two points.

y = mx + b

m = (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1) = (3000 - 250)/(0 - 4) = 2750/(-4) = -687.5

Use point (0, 3000).

3000 = -687.5(0) + b

b = 3000

The equation is

y = -687.5x + 3000

Since we are using points (t, v) instead of (x, y), we have:

v = -687.5t + 3000

Answer: d. v = -687.50 t + 3,000

6 0

2 years ago

Geometry, god bless ur help!

Furkat [3]

Answer:

15 CM

Step-by-step explanation:

Both sides are same length proven by the same angles making botrh sides 15 cm

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers