A start with question 1 and answer them all in order
B, C, D are inferences about the Squealer motivation for using propaganda does the passage support.
A squeal is a legitimate that is used to symbolize the communication of pigs. In different phrases, Squealer represented the pigs in conversation (propaganda). he's in a position to turn “black into white.” In present day day, Squealers are folks who tell on others.
Both characters are encouraged through the choice to assemble the windmill. Why does Squealer inform the opposite animals that there is no resolution in opposition to the pigs moving to the farmhouse He desires to maintain the alternative animals submissive.
Orwell suggests that Squealer is persuasive via the description of his appearance and actions. The others stated of Squealer that he ought to turn black into white. This description suggests that Squealer is able to persuading every body of some thing, a skill Napoleon puts to correct use.
Learn more about motivation here: brainly.com/question/11871721
#SPJ1
The answer is c. because seeing if you agree with your self is just crazy.
The negative trait of Armida that irritated her friend was possessiveness, as shown in option B in the first question. The lesson Armida learned from the chicks was that if a chick is held too tightly, he will fight, as shown in option D.
<h3>What happened to Armida?</h3>
- She took friendship very seriously.
- She was possessive of her friend.
- She didn't allow her friend to have other interests.
Armida proved to be a very suffocating friend. She was possessive of her friend and wanted that friend to always live up to what she wanted. This caused her friend to move away, which made her very sad.
When playing with chicks, she understood that if she holds a chick too tightly, the chick will pull away from her, just as she did with her friend.
More information about friendships at the link:
brainly.com/question/26627248
