Following World War 1, many countries felt that their punishment for participating in the war was unjust. The Soviets did not support the king's war effort and decided to do opposite of him, the Italians were unhappy that the Allies didn't give them what was promised. The Germans felt that their punishment was harsh and degrading, while Spain had a civil war in which the Fascists beat the Communists.
Correct answer: C. The congress system if set up became a model for the United Nations.
Explanation:
My authority source for choosing answer C is the United Nations itself. <em>UN Chronicle, </em>the magazine of the United Nations, featured an article titled, "From the Congress of Vienna to Present-Day International Organizations" (December, 2014). That article asserts points such as these:
- <em>When did the process of international organization start?1 It was not in 1945 nor in 1919. Rather, it was the Congress of Vienna (1814-15) that proved to be the relevant turning point in history, when certain conditions allowed a number of European States to set in motion a series of innovations, inventions and learning processes that shaped the core of what we today refer to as international organizations (IOs).</em>
- <em>The major innovation at Vienna was the follow-up conference. This new idea resulted in the custom of participating States to convene, upon reaching an agreement, a follow-up conference to assess whether previously agreed-upon decisions and policies had been executed. ... Consequently, since 1815, that innovative idea resulted in an ongoing cycle of conferences dealing with similar and related issues. Apart from continuity, the cycle produced incremental decision-making and path dependency with regard to selected common solutions and efforts.</em>
Answer:
I can infer that the Roman Society was very discriminative. The powerful and rich were not allowed to marry out of their class.
Explanation:
Answer:
In a well-regulated democracy, men give authority to leaders but are equal to them
Explanation:
According to the given passage, the author states that in a well-regulated democracy, people give authority to certain people to become leaders, such as magistrates, senators, judges, etc, but those same men are also equal to the men who gave them such authority.
Therefore, the statement that best summarizes the passage is "In a well-regulated democracy, men give authority to leaders but are equal to them"
