Answer:
France should specialize in producing phones and import computers from Sweden
Explanation:
France can produce: 4 phones or 3 computers
The opportunity cost of producing 1 phone = (3 ÷ 4)
= 0.75 computers
The opportunity cost of producing 1 computer = (4 ÷ 3)
= 1.33 phones
Sweden can produce: 1 phone or 2 computers
The opportunity cost of producing 1 phone = (2 ÷ 1)
= 2 computers
The opportunity cost of producing 1 computer = (1 ÷ 2)
= 0.5 phones
According to the comparative advantage,
Sweden has a comparative advantage in producing computers because the opportunity cost of producing computers is lower for Sweden than for France.
France has a comparative advantage in producing phones because the opportunity cost of producing phones is lower for France than for Sweden and import computers from Sweden because Sweden has a comparative advantage in producing computers.
Answer:
C) to determine the amount and/or percentage increase or decrease that has taken place.
Explanation:
Horizontal analysis can be regarded as an approach which is been used in analyzing financial statements through making comparism between specific financial information for a particular accounting period along with the information from other periods. This approach is been used by Analysts to make analysis of historical trends.
It should be noted that Horizontal analysis evaluates a series of financial statement data over a period of time to determine the amount and/or percentage increase or decrease that has taken place.
Answer:
home country spendable
Explanation:
The term that is being mentioned in this question is known as home country spendable. Like mentioned, this is income that represents the specific part of the home-country income that the assignee uses in order to pay the day-to-day purchases, unless the cost of the goods/services is higher in the host location, in which case a compensation package needs to be added.
Answer:
$102,000
Explanation:
According to 26 US code Section 704(c) - Partner's distributive share :
Taxable gain to be recognized from sale = Sale value - ( Partner's share * Fair market value )
Brooke contributed the land, the gain realized before the land was contributed = $120,000 - $90,000 will be allocated entirely to her. She will also be allocated 40% of the gain after the contribution was made = ($150,000 - $120,000) x 40% = $30,000 x 40% = $12,000.
So the total gain recognized by Brooke will be $90,000 + $12,000 = $102,000.
Partnerships are pass through entities, the partners are taxed, not the partnership itself.
Answer:
A Tying Contract
Explanation:
If a seller requires an intermediary to purchase a supplementary product to qualify to purchase the primary product the intermediary wishes to buy, it results in a tying contract. It is mostly treated as an illegal because it pushes intermediary organization to buy other products if they wishes to purchase the products which is actually needed to be purchased. Some companies make it compulsory for their intermediaries in doing so. For example, if you have to buy 10 packs of Lays, then you must be buying 5 extra boxes of Pepsi as well. It is being done because of the power and market share that company is enjoying in the market, so they take its advantage.
