The correct answer is A hasty generalization of the anecdotal evidence variety.
Explanation: In this case we can understand that the awards often do not evaluate certain areas that should be evaluated, this makes these awards not so valuable because in fact the possibilities in general are not fully explored.
Answer:
D. The Founders decide that political parties make governing more efficient and effective.
Explanation:
They decided to do this so that people will pick a side in who to side with in picking a President. That is why the Founders split it into two groups and it is still that way today.
After having relative prosperity during the second half of the 20th century until the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991. Citizens from Russia experimented relative economic hardship during the rest of the 90s. The government led by Boris Yeltsin was not successful in the transition of the economic model from socialism to open market capitalism.
Then came Vladimir Putin at the beginning of the 21st century. Under his regime, the Russian economy experimented a sustained growth due to the rising prices of oil. Industries like production, construction, real estate, and financial services all grew.
As a consequence of the improvement of the economy, the middle class grew as well as their income. GDP per capita (the amount of money the average Russian gains over a year) sharply rose since the beginning of Putin's regime and is barely reaching $12000 in 2017.
However, the country still fails to score positively in regarding corruption levels and freedom of speech. As the government is constantly accused of suppressing political opposition.
This leads to describing the standard of living of the average Russian citizen as constantly improving in economic terms, but still lacking the guarantee of security and freedom of speech.
They paid taxes in crops in exchange for protection
Answer:
C. Marbury v. Madison
Explanation:
The case of Marbury v. Madison determined the power that the judicial branch of the government can have to limit the power of the legislative branch of the government.
Prior to the case, the congress can basically pass any laws that they want without any repercussion.
The case granted the Supreme court with the power of judicial review. This enable the supreme court to examine every laws proposed by Congress before its passed. The supreme court can rejected the proposal and prevented it from becoming actual law if it violated any part of the constitutions.
