1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Murljashka [212]
4 years ago
13

Which is a correct statement about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights?

History
1 answer:
4vir4ik [10]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

It was adopted in 1948 by the UN General Assembly.

Explanation:

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a document recommended for all UN member countries, adopted at the third session of the UN General Assembly by resolution 217 A (III) (International Covenant on Human Rights) of December 10, 1948. The text of the Declaration is the first global definition of the rights that all people have. It consists of 30 articles and is part of the International Bill of Human Rights along with the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and two Optional Protocols.

You might be interested in
What evidence does the author provide to support the statement, "Pennsylvania created the most radical state constitution of the
Ilya [14]

Hello. You forgot to add the text to which this question refers. The text is:

Pennsylvania created the most radical state constitution of the period. Following the idea of popular rule to its logical conclusion, Pennsylvania created a state government with several distinctive features. First, the Pennsylvania constitution of 1776 abolished property requirements for voting as well as for holding office. If you were an adult man who paid taxes, then you were allowed to vote or even to run for office. This was a dramatic expansion of who was considered a political person, but other aspects of the new state government were even more radical. Pennsylvania also became a "unicameral" government where the legislature only had one body. Furthermore, the office of the governor was entirely eliminated. Radicals in Pennsylvania observed that the governor was really just like a small-scale king and that an upper legislative body (like the House of Lords in Parliament) was supposed to represent wealthy men and aristocrats. Rather than continue those forms of government, the Pennsylvania constitution decided that "the people" could rule most effectively through a single body with complete legislative power.

Answer:

The Pennsylvania Constitution established a unicameral legislative body.

The Pennsylvania Constitution abolished property requirements for voting and holding elected office.

Explanation:

The text above shows how Pennsylvania created a constitution a totally different and radical constitution compared to other American states. This is because Pennsylvania, through its constitution, modified its entire political body, creating a more popular structure and accessible to all citizens. The main changes occurred in terms of who could vote and stand and how the state's legislative body would be established. In summary, these changes are:

  • The Pennsylvania Constitution established a unicameral legislative body.
  • The Pennsylvania Constitution abolished property requirements for voting and holding elected office.
5 0
3 years ago
How did the world payments help cause the Great Depression to spread from the U.S. to Europe?
AysviL [449]
U.S production plummeted
U.S inventors didn't have enough money to invent
<span />
4 0
4 years ago
Who are some famous artists that influenced Diego Rivera while he was in Europe?
Andru [333]
Pablo picasso, paul gaugin and henri matisse
5 0
3 years ago
Which important civil right is not granted to people living in U.S. territories?
Leni [432]
"a. full Congressional representation" is not granted to people living in U.S. territories, although it should be noted that these people often still hold primaries for elected officials.
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the ideology of divine right explain why previous french monarch had no problem spending money?
coldgirl [10]

The French Monarch in the earlier times had no problem spending money and they also made a lot of spending because they got this money by taxing the people of France and they also taxed the nobles who had a lot of money.

This harsh taxation which was also unfair and inefficient in structure by the monarchs resulted in the crisis in France and ultimately led to the french revolution.

These taxes were also raised at a very high rates making lives of people of France very tough.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Question 4
    10·1 answer
  • A subject many nations disagree on regarding the Palestinians is that..?
    14·2 answers
  • Article v1 section to establish that the federal Constitution and federal law generally take precedence over State laws and even
    5·1 answer
  • In order to create a better America what does President Trump states, we need to reject “the politics of revenge, resistance, an
    10·1 answer
  • What were some of the cultural revival projects
    8·1 answer
  • I need help with this
    7·1 answer
  • WHAT WAS THE GREATEST EFFECT WWI HAD ON HUMANITY?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following was NOT a way Texas contributed to the<br> Confederacy during the Civil War?
    7·1 answer
  • Save
    9·1 answer
  • How did the debate over the Bill of Rights influence the
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!