Answer:
Between 2000 and 2012, the Aral Sea has experienced less water income, increased salinity, significant loss of water, the formation of separate parts, and huge loss of biodiversity.
Explanation:
The Aral Sea, once one of the largest in the world, has experienced a tragic story since 2000. Once a great and vibrant lake, it came on the verge of drying out and dissapearing from the map. The reasons for this have been the smaller water income, loss of water, increased salinity, formation of smaller separated lakes, and loss of biodiversity.
Because of agriculture, namely, cotton farming, the water supply to the lake has been significantly lowered, leading to larger evaporation than water income. The lake started to lose its water rapidly, and by becoming shallower its temperature rose, so the evaporation became even larger, the salinity increased, and from one large lake, few smaller ones have formed because a large portion of it dried out. Because of all of the aforementioned things the biodiversity suffered badly.
Answer:
(opportunity cost) A comparative advantage is the ability of a country to produce a particular good or service at a lower opportunity cost than another country.
Explanation:
The ability of producing a product or a service at a reduced cost of production than that of the competitors is referred to be an absolute advantage. The ability of producing a product or a service at low opportunity cost than that of the competitors is referred to be Comparative advantage. When a product is produced in an efficient manner than a competitor which is at a reduced it is an absolute advantage. Comparative advantage means that, instead of producing some other goods at some costs, a particular good can be produced at a lower cost. This is also termed as an opportunity cost.
hope this helped!
The Presidential Election map showed that The deep political divisions in the United States created a fractured electorate.
<h3 /><h3>What was shown by the 1860 election map?</h3>
The Democrats supported slavery in 1860 which was why they won the votes in the South. This was because the South supported slavery as their main economic industries such as cash crops, relied on enslaved labor.
The Republicans led by Abraham Lincoln were against slavery and were able to win in the North. This was because the North were against slavery for a mix of reasons with one of them being that they didn't like how cheap labor was in the South.
This showed that the political divisions in the U.S. led to a fractured electorate.
Find out more on the election of 1860 at brainly.com/question/579219
#SPJ1
Answer:
Population distribution determines in large part the cultural landscape.
Explanation:
For example, regions with high population density tend to have a cultural landscape that is characterized by being urban, or by having many towns in a relatively small land area. In these places, culture also tends to be more dynamic, because there is more human interaction.
On the other hand, regions with low population density are characterized by a rural landscape that is sparsely populated. These areas also tend to be more culturally closed, and they are less dynamic as well, because of lesser human interaction.