1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zaharov [31]
3 years ago
15

Who of the following was NOT a leader in South America for independence from European colonizers?

History
2 answers:
SashulF [63]3 years ago
7 0
Jose de San Martin, Simon Bolivar and Toussiant L'Ouverture were all leaders in South America for independence from European colonizers. So leave it to be Nopoleon was NOT a leader in South America.
lisabon 2012 [21]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Napoleon

Explanation:

  • José Francisco de San Martín y Matorras was a military man and politician whose revolutionary campaigns were decisive for the independence of Argentina, Chile and Peru. He is recognized as one of the Liberators of America for his contribution to the self-determination of a large part of Spanish America.
  • Simon Bolivar, was a Venezuelan military and politician, founder of the republics of the Great Colombia and Bolivia. He was one of the most outstanding figures of the Spanish-American emancipation against the Spanish Empire. It helped to inspire and concretize decisively the independence of the current Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, Peru and Venezuela.
  • François Dominique Toussaint-Louverture was a politician and military man, the most important among the leaders of the Haitian Revolution. He became governor of Saint Domingue, which was the name given by the French to Haiti. Part of his legacy was to have laid the foundations for the definitive eradication of slavery in Haiti and subsequently, as a consequence, in the whole world.
You might be interested in
What was the purpose of German leader Adolf Hitler’s Lebensraum policy?
Roman55 [17]

Answer:

IDEOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE OF NAZISM

Explanation:

Lebensraum became an ideological principle of Nazism and provided justification for the German territorial expansion into Central and Eastern Europe

5 0
3 years ago
How did Reagan put pressure on the Soviet union
Anestetic [448]
He put pressure on them by building a military that they could not keep up with.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which event happened first?
denpristay [2]

<u>Answer:</u>

The correct answer option is A. The Persian Wars began.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Out of the events mentioned in given answer options, we are to determine whether which of them happened first.

The correct option is 'The Persian Wars began'.

The Persian War began in 500 BC as a result of a revolt between the Greek cities in Asia Minor against the Persian conquerors.

The assistance given to the Ionians in their rebellion against the Persia and Darius (its ruler) became the main reason why the whole conflict started.

6 0
3 years ago
Research about the cause and effect of the passage 19th amendment to the US constitution and explain to your reader why it is im
Aleks04 [339]

Answer:

The 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution granted American women the right to vote, a right known as women's suffrage, and was ratified on August 18, 1920, ending almost a century of protest. ... Anthony and other activists, raised public awareness and lobbied the government to grant voting rights to women.

Explanation:

The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution protects the individual right to keep and bear arms.It was ratified on December 15, 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights.

In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court affirmed for the first time that the right belongs to individuals, for self-defense in the home,while also including, as dicta, that the right is not unlimited and does not preclude the existence of certain long-standing prohibitions such as those forbidding "the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill" or restrictions on "the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons."State and local governments are limited to the same extent as the federal government from infringing upon this right.

The Second Amendment was based partially on the right to keep and bear arms in English common law and was influenced by the English Bill of Rights of 1689. Sir William Blackstone described this right as an auxiliary right, supporting the natural rights of self-defense and resistance to oppression, and the civic duty to act in concert in defense of the state. Any labels of rights as auxiliary must be viewed in the context of the inherent purpose of a Bill of Rights, which is to empower a group with the ability to achieve a mutually desired outcome, and not to necessarily enumerate or rank the importance of rights. Thus all rights enumerated in a Constitution are thus auxiliary in the eyes of Sir William Blackstone because all rights are only as good as the extent they are exercised in fact.

While both James Monroe and John Adams supported the Constitution being ratified, its most influential framer was James Madison. In Federalist No. 46, Madison wrote how a federal army could be kept in check by state militias, "a standing army ... would be opposed [by] a militia." He argued that state militias "would be able to repel the danger" of a federal army, "It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops." He contrasted the federal government of the United States to the European kingdoms, which he described as "afraid to trust the people with arms," and assured that "the existence of subordinate governments ... forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition".

By January 1788, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia and Connecticut ratified the Constitution without insisting upon amendments. Several amendments were proposed, but were not adopted at the time the Constitution was ratified. For example, the Pennsylvania convention debated fifteen amendments, one of which concerned the right of the people to be armed, another with the militia. The Massachusetts convention also ratified the Constitution with an attached list of proposed amendments. In the end, the ratification convention was so evenly divided between those for and against the Constitution that the federalists agreed to the Bill of Rights to assure ratification.

In United States v. Cruikshank (1876), the Supreme Court ruled that, "The right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution; neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence. The Second Amendments [sic] means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress, and has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the National Government."

In United States v. Miller (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment did not protect weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia."

In the twenty-first century, the amendment has been subjected to renewed academic inquiry and judicial interest. In Heller, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision that held the amendment protects an individual's right to keep a gun for self-defense. This was the first time the Court had ruled that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual's right to own a gun.

In McDonald v. Chicago (2010), the Court clarified that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment incorporated the Second Amendment against state and local governments. In Caetano v. Massachusetts (2016), the Supreme Court reiterated its earlier rulings that "the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding" and that its protection is not limited to "only those weapons useful in warfare."

The debate between various organizations regarding gun control and gun rights continues.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best states the relationship between the government company management and striking workers during the la
snow_lady [41]

Options:

A.The government nearly always sided with striking workers against companies.

B.Companies often hired government agents to keep striking workers in line.

C.The government nearly always sided with companies against striking workers.

D.Companies often hired government agents to encourage workers to strike.

Answer:

C.The government nearly always sided with companies against striking workers.

Explanation:

    From the rise of the capitalist system (industrialization, formation of markets, banks, businesses), the rise of a new social class took place: the workers, that is, the workers of the capitalist industries. Consequently, social relations emerged between factory owners (explorers) and factory workers (exploited) that permeated the industries' daily lives.

    From these not at all friendly relations between capitalists and workers, two movements emerged in England, the Luddites and the Chartists, who had a common objective: to find solutions to the problems faced by the workers, mainly unemployment (due to the introduction of machinery that replaced several human labor forces). Both ludistas and chartists claimed, through actions (such as the breakdown of industrial machinery), the unemployed workers return to work.

    Another form of workers' claim that did not have much effect was the attempt to achieve better working conditions by requesting them from the government. Generally, the government did not respond to these demands, as the government itself owned industries.

    Over the decades, capitalism has added new features, society has undergone increasing transformations and, thus, the workers needed to articulate new ways of fighting for their causes. In this way, socialist movements emerged from the organization of workers.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was Henry Clay and not the incumbent, John Tyler, nominated by the Whig party in 1844?
    8·1 answer
  • Terrorism - Incidents around the World <br> -briefly describe the attack.
    10·2 answers
  • When was the Holland code written?
    14·2 answers
  • What motivated the French to explore and colonize in North America?
    10·1 answer
  • How did progressives hope to solve problems through political reform?
    11·2 answers
  • ANSWER NOW OR ELSE
    9·2 answers
  • 4. How did enslaved African Americans in the South help the Union in the war?
    8·2 answers
  • PLS HELP!! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!! WORTH 10 PTS!!!
    7·2 answers
  • 8. How did the Declaration of Independence create lasting benefits for those who were initially
    6·1 answer
  • TIME REMA
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!