Answer:
she said she would rather die.. the closest answer is face a lion.
Explanation:
hope this helps
Answer:
The resource Oliver should use is:
B. a scientific study published in a consumer magazine; chicken was prepared in both ways and then tested for strains of bacteria.
Explanation:
Why?
Oliver wants to know what is safer. Therefore, he should focus on resources that have criteria and proper means for testing safety when it comes to food. Option B concerns a scientific study that is bound to follow rules and procedures. That is the best option.
In option A, the blogger may be a very good cook, but that does not necessarily mean she knows and does everything in the safest possible way. In option C we have a similar situation. Nobody has ever gotten sick from grandma's chicken, but that may be a matter of luck or coincidence. Option D says food safety standards never change, which is not true. A long time ago, for instance, people did not understand the importance of washing vegetables as we do today. All these options can be eliminated.
Some people remain young forever.
The excerpt describes the swan as not aging at heart. It describes them as still being able to "wander where they will". While we know that everything ages physically, the author is showing how not everything about a person, or swan, must age. It's important here to eliminate options. The passage does not say anything about growing old, aging or changing. It says "hearts have not grown old." Any option that suggests the opposite should be eliminated. This means B-D should be eliminated.
