Answer:
1. the study of human society → sociology
2. the study of the earth → geology
3.the study of human races → ethnology
4. the study of crime → criminology
Explanation:
Sociology has to do with the study of human society. It studies how human society functions and also studies social problems.
Geology refers to the study of the physical structure of the earth. It also studies the substance. Ethnology deals with the study of human races and how they relate to each other. Criminology studies about crimes, criminals, what causes crimes and how to respond to crimes.
Therefore, the above matching is correct.
-logy suffix or -ology suffix means "the study of". A lot of fields in different types of sciences ends in -logy denoting particular fields of study. An example to prove such conclusion or theory would be biology, the study of life. Sociology is the study of human structure. Anthropology is the study of humans.
<span>On the train ride, Montag is trying to memorize Matthew 6:28, which instructs readers to forget about material possessions and to "consider the lilies of the field," beautiful blooms that grow wild on their own. His antagonist is an advertisement for Denham's dentifrice. The jingle in the ad is so abnoxious and incessant that it invades his thoughts and keeps him from being able to focus on anything meaningful.</span>
Answer:
The first uses dialogue and character; the second uses first-person point of view.
Explanation:
The first excerpt is found in Chapter Eight titled "September 2nd, 1973" from <em>Fever 1793</em> by Laurie Halse Anderson is based on the yellow fever epidemic that ravaged Philadelphia. The story is from the point of view of the young Mattie Cook, describing how the pandemic had destroyed the lives of the people.
The second excerpt is from <em>The Summer of the Pestilence</em> by George Dodd Armstrong. The book also deals with the history of the same yellow fever that not only affected Philadelphia but also other parts of the nation such as Virginia.
While both books deal with the same pandemic, their dealing with the issue of unprecedented deaths differ a bit. The first book uses a dialogue-conversation approach, with the characters greatly involved whereas the second book uses the first person point of view to address the deaths. These two books may deal with the same issue but their approaches of the deaths and sick people differ such that their narrative plots also differ.
